Animalia Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, P. O. Box 396 Økern 0513 Oslo, Norway.
Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, 0033 Oslo, Norway.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Dec 2;214:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
This study investigated the bacterial dynamics along the beef chain for clean and dirty cattle in the slaughter and processing lines, using classic quantitative methods and molecular analyses. In addition, the Norwegian national guidelines for Good Hygiene Practices in Norway were evaluated. In these guidelines, cattle presented for slaughter are categorised according to hide cleanliness, resulting in separate processing lines for meat from very dirty animals and reduced prices to farmers. The study was conducted in two commercial abattoirs in Norway. Two groups were compared; 40 visually clean cattle and 40 visually dirty cattle presented for slaughter, with 20 from each group at each abattoir. The same animals were sampled at five sampling sites: hides, carcass surfaces after dehiding, just before chilling, after chilling, and meat trimmings. Meat trimmings were sampled in only one abattoir. Three hundred and sixty samples were collected by swabbing 100 cm(2) of the brisket area at the first four sampling sites, and sampling 200 g of meat trimmings at the fifth site. The results showed that the hides of dirty cattle had more Enterobacteriaceae and higher Aerobic Plate Counts (APC) than visually clean cattle (P<0.05), however there was no significant difference for Escherichia coli. For the other sampling sites, there were no differences between the dirty and the clean group. An effect of chilling/drying of the carcass surfaces was demonstrated by the significant reduction in the number of carcasses on which E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae were detected; from 11% and 39% before chilling to 1% and 16% after chilling, respectively. Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli were detected in only three and one of the meat trimming samples, respectively. Amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene from 643 Enterobacteriaceae colonies derived from 107 samples demonstrated that Escherichia/Shigella were dominant within this family on the hides. However, after dehiding, after grading, and after chilling, the genera Citrobacter and Enterobacter dominated. The meat trimmings were dominated by the genera Kluyvera, Hafnia, and unclassified Enterobacteriaceae. The relative proportions of Escherichia/Shigella were higher for dirty animals than for clean animals, and were higher on hides than from sampling sites further down the chain (P<0.05). The minor differences in contamination on carcass surfaces and meat trimmings between clean and dirty cattle indicate that separate processing lines in Norwegian abattoirs seem to be unnecessary.
本研究使用经典定量方法和分子分析技术,调查了屠宰和加工过程中清洁牛和脏牛的牛肉链中的细菌动态。此外,还评估了挪威的良好卫生规范国家指南。根据这些指南,待宰牛按皮毛清洁度分类,导致非常脏动物的肉采用单独的加工线,并降低农民的价格。该研究在挪威的两个商业屠宰场进行。比较了两组:40 头外观清洁的牛和 40 头外观脏的牛待宰,每个屠宰场均有 20 头来自每组。对同一动物在五个采样点进行了采样:剥皮后的胴体表面、在预冷却之前、冷却之后和肉屑。仅在一个屠宰场中对肉屑进行了采样。通过在四个采样点中的前四个采样点上擦拭 100cm2 的胸肉区域收集了 360 个样本,在第五个采样点上采集了 200g 的肉屑。结果表明,脏牛的皮毛携带更多的肠杆菌科和更高的需氧平板计数(APC),而清洁牛的肠杆菌科和 APC 没有差异(P<0.05)。对于其他采样点,脏牛组和清洁牛组之间没有差异。冷却/干燥胴体表面的作用是通过显着减少检测到大肠杆菌和肠杆菌科的胴体数量来证明的;冷却前分别为 11%和 39%,冷却后分别为 1%和 16%。仅在三个肉屑样本中检测到肠杆菌科和大肠杆菌。从 107 个样本中获得的 643 个肠杆菌科细菌的 16S rRNA 基因的扩增和测序表明,在该家族中,大肠埃希氏菌/志贺氏菌在皮毛上占优势。然而,剥皮后、分级后和冷却后,柠檬酸杆菌和肠杆菌属占主导地位。肉屑中主要是克吕韦尔氏菌、哈夫尼亚菌和未分类的肠杆菌科。肮脏动物的大肠杆菌/志贺氏菌相对比例高于清洁动物,皮毛上的比例高于链条下游的采样点(P<0.05)。清洁牛和脏牛的胴体表面和肉屑污染差异较小,表明挪威屠宰场的单独加工线似乎没有必要。