• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典农民与官方动物福利检查员视角下的牛群卫生状况

Cattle Cleanliness from the View of Swedish Farmers and Official Animal Welfare Inspectors.

作者信息

Lundmark Hedman Frida, Andersson Maria, Kinch Vanja, Lindholm Amelie, Nordqvist Angelica, Westin Rebecka

机构信息

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden.

The County Administrative Board in Halland, Slottsgatan 2, 30186 Halmstad, Sweden.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;11(4):945. doi: 10.3390/ani11040945.

DOI:10.3390/ani11040945
PMID:33801666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8066830/
Abstract

Dirty cattle have been commonly recorded in official animal welfare inspections in Sweden for years. The relevant authorities have initiated work to better understand the causes of dirty cattle, in order to improve compliance and standardize the grounds for categorizing a farm as non-compliant with welfare legislation when dirty animals are present. This study investigated the occurrence of dirty cattle in official animal welfare controls, on Swedish cattle farms, and examined farmers' views on the reasons for non-compliance and on key factors in keeping animals clean. The data used were collected by animal welfare inspectors at the county level during the regular official inspections of 371 dairy and beef cattle farms over two weeks in winter 2020. In addition to completing the usual inspection protocol, the inspectors asked farmers a set of questions relating to why their animals were clean or dirty. Dirty cattle were found on 49% of the farms inspected, but only 33% of the farms were categorized as being non-compliant with Swedish welfare legislation. According to inspectors and farmers, dirtiness in cattle depends mainly on management routines, which is a promising result since routines can be improved. The results also revealed a need for better guidance for inspectors and farmers on when dirtiness should be categorized as non-compliance with animal welfare legislation.

摘要

多年来,瑞典官方动物福利检查中经常记录到牛只肮脏的情况。相关当局已开展工作,以更好地了解牛只肮脏的原因,从而提高合规性,并规范在存在肮脏动物的情况下将农场归类为不符合福利立法的依据。本研究调查了瑞典奶牛场官方动物福利检查中肮脏牛只的出现情况,并考察了农民对违规原因以及保持动物清洁的关键因素的看法。所使用的数据是由县级动物福利检查员在2020年冬季的两周内对371个奶牛场和肉牛场进行定期官方检查时收集的。除了完成常规检查程序外,检查员还向农民询问了一系列有关其动物干净或肮脏原因的问题。在所检查的农场中,49%发现有肮脏的牛只,但只有33%的农场被归类为不符合瑞典福利立法。根据检查员和农民的说法,牛只的肮脏主要取决于管理程序,这是一个很有希望的结果,因为程序是可以改进的。结果还表明,需要就何时应将肮脏情况归类为不符合动物福利立法,为检查员和农民提供更好的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/266a6e0591b6/animals-11-00945-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/ef4ee75e3412/animals-11-00945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/3e2f05fa993d/animals-11-00945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/1dfbfb4d4d14/animals-11-00945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/266a6e0591b6/animals-11-00945-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/ef4ee75e3412/animals-11-00945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/3e2f05fa993d/animals-11-00945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/1dfbfb4d4d14/animals-11-00945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/8066830/266a6e0591b6/animals-11-00945-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cattle Cleanliness from the View of Swedish Farmers and Official Animal Welfare Inspectors.瑞典农民与官方动物福利检查员视角下的牛群卫生状况
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;11(4):945. doi: 10.3390/ani11040945.
2
Animal welfare official inspections: farmers and inspectors shared concerns.动物福利官方检查:养殖户和检查人员共同关注。
Animal. 2021 Jan;15(1):100038. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100038. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Factors associated with cattle cleanliness on Norwegian dairy farms.与挪威奶牛场奶牛清洁度相关的因素。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 May;95(5):2485-96. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4786.
4
Assessment of Welfare Problems in Finnish Cattle and Pig Farms Based on Official Inspection Reports.基于官方检查报告对芬兰奶牛场和养猪场福利问题的评估
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 22;9(5):263. doi: 10.3390/ani9050263.
5
Non-Compliance and Follow-Up in Swedish Official and Private Animal Welfare Control of Dairy Cows.瑞典官方及私人对奶牛的动物福利管控中的违规行为及后续跟进
Animals (Basel). 2018 May 8;8(5):72. doi: 10.3390/ani8050072.
6
Perceptions of farming stakeholders towards automating dairy cattle mobility and body condition scoring in farm assurance schemes.养殖利益相关者对农场保障计划中奶牛活动和身体状况自动评分的看法。
Animal. 2023 May;17(5):100786. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100786. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
7
Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle.畜舍特征对奶牛动物福利指标的影响。
Animal. 2020 Sep;14(9):1934-1942. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000609. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Invited review: Examining farmers' personalities and attitudes as possible risk factors for dairy cattle health, welfare, productivity, and farm management: A systematic scoping review.邀请评论:研究农民的个性和态度作为奶牛健康、福利、生产力和农场管理的潜在风险因素:系统范围审查。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):3805-3824. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15037. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Short communication: Accuracy of estimation of lameness, injury, and cleanliness prevalence by dairy farmers and veterinarians.短讯:奶农和兽医对跛行、损伤和清洁度流行情况的估计准确性。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Nov;103(11):10696-10702. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18651. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
An epidemiological analysis of equine welfare data from regulatory inspections by the official competent authorities.官方主管部门对监管检查中的马匹福利数据进行的流行病学分析。
Animal. 2017 Jul;11(7):1237-1248. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002512. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical environmental enrichment to improve animal welfare-related outcomes in indoor cattle.一项关于改善室内牛只与动物福利相关结果的物理环境富集的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anim Welf. 2025 Jun 13;34:e37. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.28. eCollection 2025.
2
Official and private animal welfare inspectors' perception of their own on-site inspections.官方和私人动物福利检查员对其自身现场检查的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Apr 25;12:1575471. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1575471. eCollection 2025.
3
Animal-based welfare indicators for dairy cows and their validity and practicality: a systematic review of the existing literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Human Behaviour Change Interventions in Animal Care and Interactive Settings: A Review and Framework for Design and Evaluation.动物护理与互动环境中的人类行为改变干预措施:一项综述及设计与评估框架
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 8;10(12):2333. doi: 10.3390/ani10122333.
2
Evaluation of Criminal Sanctions Concerning Violations of Cattle and Pig Welfare.对违反牛和猪福利相关刑事制裁的评估。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 19;10(4):715. doi: 10.3390/ani10040715.
3
Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.
奶牛基于动物的福利指标及其有效性和实用性:对现有文献的系统综述
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 11;11:1429097. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1429097. eCollection 2024.
4
The first protocol for assessing the welfare of dromedary camels () kept under nomadic pastoralism.第一个用于评估在游牧畜牧业下饲养的单峰骆驼福利的方案。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 11;11:1416714. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1416714. eCollection 2024.
5
Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review.肉类安全立法及其创新方法的机遇与障碍:综述
Food Control. 2022 Nov;141:109160. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160.
6
Thirty Years of Changes and the Current State of Swedish Animal Welfare Legislation.瑞典动物福利立法三十年的变迁与现状
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;11(10):2901. doi: 10.3390/ani11102901.
7
Managing Animal Welfare in Food Governance in Norway and Sweden: Challenges in Implementation and Coordination.挪威和瑞典食品治理中的动物福利管理:实施与协调方面的挑战
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 25;11(7):1899. doi: 10.3390/ani11071899.
关于养殖系统对奶牛福利和疾病影响的科学报告。
EFSA J. 2009 Jul 9;7(7):1143r. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1143r. eCollection 2009 Jul.
4
Welfare Challenges of Dairy Cows in India Identified Through On-Farm Observations.通过农场观察识别印度奶牛的福利挑战
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;10(4):586. doi: 10.3390/ani10040586.
5
Prevalence of hock, knee, and neck skin lesions and associated risk factors in dairy herds in the Maritime Provinces of Canada.加拿大海洋省份奶牛群跗关节、膝关节和颈部皮肤损伤的流行情况及其相关风险因素。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3376-3391. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15080. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
6
Effects of 3 surface types on dairy cattle behavior, preference, and hygiene.三种表面类型对奶牛行为、偏好和卫生的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1530-1541. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14792. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Non-Compliance and Follow-Up in Swedish Official and Private Animal Welfare Control of Dairy Cows.瑞典官方及私人对奶牛的动物福利管控中的违规行为及后续跟进
Animals (Basel). 2018 May 8;8(5):72. doi: 10.3390/ani8050072.
8
Private Animal Welfare Standards-Opportunities and Risks.私人动物福利标准——机遇与风险
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jan 2;8(1):4. doi: 10.3390/ani8010004.
9
Prevalence of lameness and leg lesions of lactating dairy cows housed in southern Brazil: Effects of housing systems.巴西南部圈养泌乳奶牛跛行和腿部病变的流行情况:饲养系统的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Mar;101(3):2395-2405. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13462. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Cow- and farm-level risk factors for lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems.采用自动挤奶系统的奶牛场中导致跛足的奶牛及农场层面的风险因素。
J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):3732-3743. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10414. Epub 2016 Feb 28.