Tsetsilas Michaela, Konermann Anna-Christin, Keilig Ludger, Reimann Susanne, Jäger Andreas, Bourauel Christoph
Department of Orthodontics, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Endowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Sep;76(5):377-90. doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0298-0.
A transpalatal arch (TPA) directly connecting the maxillary first molars can be used in passive (for stabilization) and active (for molar or segment movement) modes. Activation may be symmetric or asymmetric. This study was performed to analyze the effectiveness of TPAs for transverse expansion treatment by measuring both the force systems they deliver and the clinical tooth movements thus achieved.
Ten patients (six with symmetric and four with asymmetric transverse discrepancies) were treated using a TPA made of titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) and fitted with 0.032" × 0.032" Burstone lingual brackets. The force systems exerted by these TPAs and the resultant tooth movements were first simulated and measured inside the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). All TPAs, whether used in the symmetric or asymmetric activation mode, were adjusted to an expansive force of 4 N. After a treatment of 12 weeks, their effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the clinical tooth movements to the movements simulated in the OMSS.
Clinically, the symmetric treatments resulted in a mean correction of 4.5 ± 1.0 mm and a mean of buccal crown tipping of 10.1°, compared to 9.6° for the movements simulated in the OMSS. The four cases of unilateral crossbite were treated with an asymmetrically activated TPA (including a force on one side and a combination of force and negative torque on the other side). The intended unilateral expansion was achieved in all four cases. Vertical side effects were acceptably small in both the symmetric and the asymmetric treatment cases. The tooth movements could be implemented as planned in all 10 patients, whereby in 5 patients complete correction of the occlusal width discrepancy was achieved by the end of the 12-week treatment.
Given this combination of good efficacy and minor side effects, the TMA/TPA appliance may be recommended as a suitable approach to correct transverse discrepancies. Recommendations expressed in previous studies for the use of Burstone-type TMA/TPA in these situations is confirmed by our study.
直接连接上颌第一磨牙的横腭杆(TPA)可用于被动(用于稳定)和主动(用于磨牙或牙段移动)模式。激活可以是对称的或不对称的。本研究旨在通过测量TPA传递的力系统以及由此实现的临床牙齿移动,分析TPA在横向扩展治疗中的有效性。
10例患者(6例对称横向差异患者和4例不对称横向差异患者)使用由钛钼合金(TMA)制成并配有0.032"×0.032"Burstone舌侧托槽的TPA进行治疗。这些TPA施加的力系统和由此产生的牙齿移动首先在正畸测量与模拟系统(OMSS)内进行模拟和测量。所有TPA,无论用于对称激活模式还是不对称激活模式,均调整为4 N的扩张力。治疗12周后,通过将临床牙齿移动与OMSS中模拟的移动进行比较来分析其有效性。
临床上,对称治疗平均矫正4.5±1.0 mm,颊侧冠倾斜平均为10.1°,而OMSS中模拟的移动为9.6°。4例单侧反合患者采用不对称激活的TPA进行治疗(一侧施加力,另一侧施加力和负扭矩的组合)。所有4例患者均实现了预期的单侧扩展。对称和不对称治疗病例的垂直副作用都小到可以接受。所有10例患者的牙齿移动都可以按计划实施,其中5例患者在12周治疗结束时实现了咬合宽度差异的完全矫正。
鉴于这种良好疗效和轻微副作用的组合,TMA/TPA矫治器可被推荐为矫正横向差异的合适方法。我们的研究证实了先前研究中关于在这些情况下使用Burstone型TMA/TPA的建议。