Finnigan Simon, Wong Andrew, Read Stephen
UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Acute Stroke Unit, Neurology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1452-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) indices sensitive to abnormal slow (relative to faster) activity power seem uniquely informative for clinical management of ischaemic stroke (IS), including around acute reperfusion therapies. However these have not been compared between IS and control samples. The primary objective was to identify the QEEG slowing index and threshold value which can most accurately discriminate between IS patients and controls.
The samples comprised 28 controls (mean age: 70.4; range: 56-84) and 18 patients (mean age: 69.3; range: 51-86). Seven indices were analysed: relative bandpower (delta, theta, alpha, beta), delta/alpha power ratio (DAR), (delta+theta)/(alpha+beta) ratio (DTABR) and QSLOWING. The accuracies of each index for classifying participants (IS or control) were analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques.
All indices differed significantly between the samples (p<.001). DAR alone exhibited optimal classifier accuracy, with a threshold of 3.7 demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for discriminating between radiologically-confirmed, acute IS or control. DTABR and relative delta were the next most accurate classifiers.
DAR of 3.7 demonstrated maximal accuracy for classifying all 46 participants as acute IS or control.
DAR assessment may inform clinical management of IS and perhaps other neurocritical patients.
对异常慢波(相对于快波)活动功率敏感的定量脑电图(QEEG)指标似乎对缺血性卒中(IS)的临床管理具有独特的信息价值,包括在急性再灌注治疗前后。然而,尚未在IS样本和对照样本之间进行比较。主要目的是确定能够最准确地区分IS患者和对照的QEEG慢波指数和阈值。
样本包括28名对照者(平均年龄:70.4岁;范围:56 - 84岁)和18名患者(平均年龄:69.3岁;范围:51 - 86岁)。分析了七个指标:相对频段功率(δ波、θ波、α波、β波)、δ/α功率比(DAR)、(δ+θ)/(α+β)比(DTABR)和Q慢波。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)技术分析每个指标对参与者(IS或对照)进行分类的准确性。
样本之间所有指标均存在显著差异(p<0.001)。仅DAR表现出最佳的分类器准确性,阈值为3.7时,对经放射学证实的急性IS或对照进行区分的灵敏度和特异度均为100%。DTABR和相对δ波是其次最准确的分类器。
DAR为3.7时,将所有46名参与者分类为急性IS或对照的准确性最高。
DAR评估可能为IS以及其他神经危重症患者的临床管理提供参考。