Fortnum Debbie, Grennan Kirren, Smolonogov Tatiana
Kidney Health Australia , Perth , Australia.
Kidney Health Australia , Sydney , Australia.
Clin Kidney J. 2015 Aug;8(4):469-75. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv050. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
A multidisciplinary team in Australia and New Zealand utilized a current decision-making theory to develop the 'My Kidneys, My Choice' decision aid (MKDA) to support end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treatment options in decision-making. Assessment of the MKDA was deemed critical to practice integration.
A multisite pre-test, post-test study design was used. Routine ESKD education was supported by the MKDA. Knowledge levels, worries and priorities were assessed pre- and post-education with Likert-scale questions. MKDA usability and treatment option preferences were surveyed post-test. Data were analysed in SPSS.
Ninety-seven participants completed the pre-survey and 72 (70%) the post-survey. Mean pre-test knowledge scores ranged from: 0.88 (SD 1.5) for conservative care to 1.32 (SD 1.3) for centre-based dialysis. Post-decision-making knowledge levels increased significantly (P < 0.001). Worry and flexibility scores all increased significantly (P < 0.05) from pre- to post-test; about future pre- 4.15 (SD 1.3), post- 4.61 (SD 0.76); change to lifestyle 4.23 (SD 1.05), 4.59 (SD 0.8); ability to work/do leisure activities 3.67 (SD 1.56) 4.27 (SD 1.17) and desire for flexibility 4.51 (SD 0.86), 4.76 (SD 0.66). MKDA usability scores were high: easy to understand 4.64, (SD 0.77), easy to follow 4.65, (SD 0.66) and supporting decision-making 4.76 (SD 0.61). MKDA section scores ranged from 4.21 (SD 0.75) for writing treatment choices to 4.90 (SD 0.41) for the use of the treatment option comparison grid.
Preliminary MKDA assessment revealed high patient acceptance and usability. Patients had equitable knowledge of all treatment options but experienced higher post-worries levels than anticipated.
澳大利亚和新西兰的一个多学科团队运用当前的决策理论开发了“我的肾脏,我的选择”决策辅助工具(MKDA),以支持终末期肾病(ESKD)治疗方案的决策制定。对MKDA的评估被认为对实践整合至关重要。
采用多地点的预测试、后测试研究设计。MKDA为常规ESKD教育提供支持。通过李克特量表问题在教育前后评估知识水平、担忧程度和优先事项。在测试后对MKDA的可用性和治疗方案偏好进行调查。数据在SPSS中进行分析。
97名参与者完成了预调查,72名(70%)完成了后调查。测试前的平均知识得分范围为:保守治疗0.88(标准差1.5),中心透析1.32(标准差1.3)。决策后知识水平显著提高(P<0.001)。从测试前到测试后,担忧和灵活性得分均显著提高(P<0.05);关于未来,测试前为4.15(标准差1.3),测试后为4.61(标准差0.76);生活方式改变方面,测试前为4.23(标准差1.05),测试后为4.59(标准差0.8);工作/进行休闲活动的能力方面,测试前为3.67(标准差1.56),测试后为4.27(标准差1.17);对灵活性的渴望方面,测试前为4.51(标准差0.86),测试后为4.76(标准差0.66)。MKDA的可用性得分较高:易于理解为4.64(标准差0.77),易于遵循为4.65(标准差0.66),支持决策制定为4.76(标准差0.61)。MKDA各部分得分范围为:治疗选择的书写部分为4.21(标准差0.75),治疗方案比较网格的使用部分为4.90(标准差0.41)。
MKDA的初步评估显示患者接受度和可用性较高。患者对所有治疗方案有同等的了解,但担忧程度比预期更高。