Hackert Volker H, Dukers-Muijrers Nicole H T M, van Loo Inge H M, Wegdam-Blans Marjolijn, Somers Carlijn, Hoebe Christian J P A
From the *Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Geleen, The Netherlands; †Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; and ‡Department of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology (PAMM), Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Dec;34(12):1283-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000871.
Q fever is rarely reported in children/adolescents. Although lower reporting rates are commonly attributed to milder disease and subsequent underdiagnosis in infected children/adolescents, pertinent evidence is scarce. We present data from a large, well-defined single-point source outbreak of Q fever to fill this gap.
We compared (A) Q fever testing and notification rates in children/adolescents who were 0-19 years of age with those in adults 20+ years of age in October 2009; (B) serological attack rates of acute Q fever in children/adolescents with the rates in adults after on-source exposure on the outbreak farm's premises; (C) incidence of Q fever infection in children/adolescents with that in adults after off-source exposure in the municipality located closest to the farm.
(A) Children/adolescents represented 19.3% (59,404 of 307,348) of the study area population, 12.1% (149 of 1217) of all subjects tested in October 2009 and 4.3% (11 of 253) of notified laboratory-confirmed community cases. (B) Serological attack rate of acute Q fever in children with on-source exposure was 71% (12 of 17), similar to adults [68% (40 of 59)]. (C) Incidence of infection in children/adolescents after community (off-source) exposure was 4.5% (13 of 287) versus 11.0% (12 of 109) in adults (adjusted odds ratio: 0.36; 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.84; P = 0.02). No children/adolescents reported clinical symptoms. Proportion of notified infections was significantly lower in children/adolescents (2.5%) than in adults (10.4%; risk ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.80, P = 0.02).
Notified Q fever was less frequent in children/adolescents than in adults. Although underrecognition contributed to this phenomenon, lower rates of infection in children after community exposure played an unexpected major role. On-source (presumed high-dose) exposure, by contrast, was associated with high serological and clinical attack rates not only in adults but also in children/adolescents. Our findings allow for improved age-specific clinical and public health risk assessment in Q fever outbreaks.
儿童/青少年中Q热的报告很少。虽然报告率较低通常归因于感染儿童/青少年的病情较轻以及随后的诊断不足,但相关证据很少。我们提供来自一次大型、明确的单点源Q热暴发的数据以填补这一空白。
我们比较了(A)2009年10月0至19岁儿童/青少年与20岁及以上成年人的Q热检测和报告率;(B)在暴发农场场所内暴露于源头后,儿童/青少年急性Q热的血清学感染率与成年人的感染率;(C)在最靠近农场的市镇中,儿童/青少年在暴露于源头外后Q热感染的发病率与成年人的发病率。
(A)儿童/青少年占研究区域人口的19.3%(307,348人中的59,404人),占2009年10月所有检测对象的12.1%(1217人中的149人),以及报告的实验室确诊社区病例的4.3%(253人中的11人)。(B)暴露于源头的儿童急性Q热的血清学感染率为71%(17人中的12人),与成年人相似[68%(59人中的40人)]。(C)社区(源头外)暴露后儿童/青少年的感染发病率为4.5%(287人中的13人),而成年人的发病率为11.0%(109人中的12人)(调整后的优势比:0.36;95%置信区间:0.16 - 0.84;P = 0.02)。没有儿童/青少年报告临床症状。儿童/青少年中报告感染的比例(2.5%)显著低于成年人(10.4%;风险比:0.26;95%置信区间:0.08 - 0.80,P = 0.02)。
儿童/青少年中报告的Q热病例比成年人少。虽然认识不足导致了这一现象,但社区暴露后儿童感染率较低起到了意想不到的主要作用。相比之下,源头(假定高剂量)暴露不仅在成年人中,而且在儿童/青少年中都与高血清学和临床感染率相关。我们的研究结果有助于在Q热暴发中改进针对特定年龄的临床和公共卫生风险评估。