Choi BongKyoo, Steiss Dale, Garcia-Rivas Javier, Kojaku Stacey, Schnall Peter, Dobson Marnie, Baker Dean
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Irvine, 100 Theory, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):435-48. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1082-6. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
This study aims to examine whether body mass index (BMI) overestimates the prevalence of overweight or obese firefighters when compared to waist circumference (WC) and skinfold-based percent body fat (PBF) and to investigate differential relationships of the three adiposity measures with other biological cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors.
The adiposity of 355 (347 males and eight females) California firefighters was assessed using three different measures. Other CVD risk factors (high blood pressure, high lipid profiles, high glucose, and low VO2 max) of the firefighters were also clinically assessed.
The prevalence of total overweight and obesity was significantly (p < 0.01) higher by BMI (80.4 %) than by WC (48.7 %) and by PBF (55.6 %) in male firefighters. In particular, the prevalence of overweight firefighters was much higher (p < 0.01) by BMI (57.3 %) than by WC (24.5 %) and PBF (38.3 %). 60-64 % of male firefighters who were assessed as normal weight by WC and PBF were misclassified as overweight by BMI. When overweight by BMI was defined as 27.5-29.9 kg/m(2) (vs. the standard definition of 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), the agreement of the adiposity classification increased between BMI and other two adiposity measures. Obese firefighters had the highest CVD risk profiles across all three adiposity measures. Only when overweight by BMI was defined narrowly, overweight firefighters had substantially higher CVD risk profiles. Obesity and overweight were less prevalent in female and Asian male firefighters.
BMI overestimated the prevalence of total overweight and obesity among male firefighters, compared to WC and skinfold-based PBF. Overweight by BMI needs to be more narrowly defined, or the prevalence of BMI-based overweight (27.5-29.9 kg/m(2)) should be reported additionally for prevention of CVD among male firefighters.
本研究旨在探讨与腰围(WC)和基于皮褶厚度的体脂百分比(PBF)相比,体重指数(BMI)是否高估了超重或肥胖消防员的患病率,并研究这三种肥胖测量指标与其他生物心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素之间的差异关系。
使用三种不同的测量方法评估了355名(347名男性和8名女性)加利福尼亚消防员的肥胖情况。还对消防员的其他CVD风险因素(高血压、高血脂、高血糖和低最大摄氧量)进行了临床评估。
在男性消防员中,BMI(80.4%)评估的超重和肥胖总患病率显著高于WC(48.7%)和PBF(55.6%)(p<0.01)。特别是,BMI评估的超重消防员患病率(57.3%)远高于WC(24.5%)和PBF(38.3%)(p<0.01)。WC和PBF评估为正常体重的男性消防员中,60 - 64%被BMI误分类为超重。当将BMI超重定义为27.5 - 29.9 kg/m²(相对于标准定义25.0 - 29.9 kg/m²)时,BMI与其他两种肥胖测量指标之间的肥胖分类一致性增加。在所有三种肥胖测量指标中,肥胖消防员的CVD风险特征最高。只有当BMI超重定义较窄时,超重消防员才有显著更高的CVD风险特征。肥胖和超重在女性和亚洲男性消防员中不太普遍。
与WC和基于皮褶厚度的PBF相比,BMI高估了男性消防员中超重和肥胖的总患病率。需要更窄地定义BMI超重,或者应额外报告基于BMI的超重患病率(27.5 - 29.9 kg/m²),以预防男性消防员的CVD。