O'Brien D, Hennessy T, Moran B, Shalloo L
Livestock Systems Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Oct;98(10):7394-407. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9222. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of milk or the carbon footprint (CF) of milk is a key issue for the European dairy sector given rising concerns over the potential adverse effects of climate change. Several strategies are available to mitigate GHG emissions, but producing milk with a low CF does not necessarily imply that a dairy farm is economically viable. Therefore, to understand the relationship between the CF of milk and dairy farm economic performance, the farm accountancy network database of a European Union nation (Ireland) was applied to a GHG emission model. The method used to quantify GHG emissions was life cycle assessment (LCA), which was independently certified to comply with the British standard for LCA. The model calculated annual on- and off-farm GHG emissions from imported inputs (e.g., electricity) up to the point milk was sold from the farm in CO2-equivalent (CO2-eq). Annual GHG emissions computed using LCA were allocated to milk based on the economic value of dairy farm products and expressed per kilogram of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). The results showed for a nationally representative sample of 221 grass-based Irish dairy farms in 2012 that gross profit averaged € 0.18/L of milk and € 1,758/ha and gross income was € 40,899/labor unit. Net profit averaged € 0.08/L of milk and € 750/ha and net income averaged € 18,125/labor unit. However, significant variability was noted in farm performance across each financial output measure. For instance, net margin per hectare of the top one-third of farms was 6.5 times higher than the bottom third. Financial performance measures were inversely correlated with the CF of milk, which averaged 1.20 kg of CO2-eq/kg of FPCM but ranged from 0.60 to 2.13 kg of CO2-eq/kg of FPCM. Partial least squares regression analysis of correlations between financial and environmental performance indicated that extending the length of the grazing season and increasing milk production per hectare or per cow reduced the CF of milk and increased farm profit. However, where higher milk production per hectare was associated with greater concentrate feeding, this adversely affected the CF of milk and economic performance by increasing both costs and off-farm emissions. Therefore, to mitigate the CF of milk and improve economic performance, grass-based dairy farms should not aim to only increase milk output, but instead target increasing milk production per hectare from grazed grass.
鉴于对气候变化潜在不利影响的担忧日益增加,降低每单位牛奶的温室气体(GHG)排放量或牛奶的碳足迹(CF)是欧洲乳制品行业的一个关键问题。有几种策略可用于减少温室气体排放,但生产低CF的牛奶并不一定意味着奶牛场在经济上可行。因此,为了了解牛奶的CF与奶牛场经济绩效之间的关系,将一个欧盟国家(爱尔兰)的农场会计网络数据库应用于一个温室气体排放模型。用于量化温室气体排放的方法是生命周期评估(LCA),该评估经过独立认证,符合英国LCA标准。该模型计算了从进口投入品(如电力)到牛奶从农场售出时的年度农场内和农场外温室气体排放量,以二氧化碳当量(CO2-eq)表示。使用LCA计算的年度温室气体排放量根据奶牛场产品的经济价值分配到牛奶中,并以每千克脂肪和蛋白质校正牛奶(FPCM)表示。结果显示,对于2012年爱尔兰221个以草为基础的具有全国代表性的奶牛场样本,平均毛利润为每升牛奶0.18欧元和每公顷1758欧元,总收入为每劳动单位40899欧元。净利润平均为每升牛奶0.08欧元和每公顷750欧元,净收入平均为每劳动单位18125欧元。然而,在每个财务产出指标上,农场绩效存在显著差异。例如,前三分之一农场每公顷的净利润率是后三分之一农场的6.5倍。财务绩效指标与牛奶的CF呈负相关,牛奶的CF平均为1.20千克CO2-eq/千克FPCM,但范围为0.60至2.13千克CO2-eq/千克FPCM。对财务和环境绩效之间相关性的偏最小二乘回归分析表明,延长放牧季节的长度以及提高每公顷或每头奶牛的牛奶产量可降低牛奶的CF并增加农场利润。然而,每公顷较高的牛奶产量与更多的精饲料喂养相关时,这会通过增加成本和农场外排放对牛奶的CF和经济绩效产生不利影响。因此,为了降低牛奶的CF并提高经济绩效,以草为基础的奶牛场不应仅旨在增加牛奶产量,而应目标是提高每公顷放牧草地产出的牛奶量。