Department of Farm Management, Schloss Osthof Süd, Hohenheim University, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
Department of Farm Management, Schloss Osthof Süd, Hohenheim University, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2015 Apr 1;152:11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
Allocation of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) is challenging especially when multi-functionality of dairy farms, which do not only produce milk but also meat is considered. Moreover, some farms fulfill a wide range of additional services for society such as management of renewable natural resources as well as preservation of biodiversity and cultural landscapes. Due to the increasing degradation of ecosystems many industrialized as well as developing countries designed payment systems for environmental services. This study examines different allocation methods of GHG for a comparatively large convenience sample of 113 dairy farms located in grassland-based areas of southern Germany. Results are carbon footprints of 1.99 kg CO2eq/kg of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) on average if "no allocation" for coupled products is performed. "Physical allocation" results in 1.53 kg CO2eq/kg FPCM and "conventional economic allocation" in 1.66 kg CO2eq/kg FPCM on average if emissions are apportioned between milk and meat. Economic allocation which includes ecosystem services for society based on the farm net income as a new aspect in this study results in a carbon footprint of 1.5 kg CO2eq/kg FPCM on average. System expansion that puts greater emphasis on coupled beef production accounts for a carbon footprint of 0.68 kg CO2eq/kg FPCM on average. Intense milk production systems with higher milk yields show better results based on "no allocation", "physical allocation" and "conventional economic allocation". By contrast, economic allocation, which takes into account ecosystem services favors extensive systems, especially in less favored areas. This shows that carbon footprints of dairy farms should not be examined one-dimensionally based on the amount of milk and meat that is produced on the farm. Rather, a broader perspective is necessary that takes into account the multi-functionality of dairy farms especially in countries where a wide range of ecosystem services is provided.
生命周期评估(LCA)中温室气体(GHG)的分配具有挑战性,特别是当考虑到奶牛场的多功能性时,这些奶牛场不仅生产牛奶,还生产肉类。此外,一些农场为社会提供广泛的额外服务,如可再生自然资源的管理以及生物多样性和文化景观的保护。由于生态系统的日益退化,许多工业化和发展中国家都为环境服务设计了支付系统。本研究考察了 113 个位于德国南部草地地区的大型奶牛场的不同 GHG 分配方法。如果对耦合产品不进行“无分配”,则平均每个奶牛场的碳足迹为 1.99 千克二氧化碳当量/千克脂肪和蛋白质校正奶(FPCM)。如果将排放分配给牛奶和肉类,则“物理分配”的结果为 1.53 千克二氧化碳当量/千克 FPCM,“常规经济分配”的结果为 1.66 千克二氧化碳当量/千克 FPCM。如果包括基于农场净收入的社会生态系统服务的经济分配,则为平均 1.5 千克二氧化碳当量/千克 FPCM。本研究中的一个新方面是将系统扩展到更加强调耦合牛肉生产,平均碳足迹为 0.68 千克二氧化碳当量/千克 FPCM。基于“无分配”、“物理分配”和“常规经济分配”,具有更高牛奶产量的密集型牛奶生产系统的结果更好。相比之下,考虑到生态系统服务的经济分配有利于广泛的系统,特别是在条件较差的地区。这表明,奶牛场的碳足迹不应仅根据农场生产的牛奶和肉类数量进行一维检查。相反,需要考虑到奶牛场的多功能性,特别是在提供广泛的生态系统服务的国家。