Brabson Laurel A, Brown Jessica L, Capriotti Matthew R, Ramanujam Krishnapriya, Himle Michael B, Nicotra Cassandra M, Ostrander Rick, Kelly Laura M, Grados Marco A, Walkup John T, Perry-Parrish Carisa, Reynolds Elizabeth K, Hankinson Jessica C, Specht Matt W
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bloomberg Children's Center, Level 12, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21283, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 224 Garland Hall, 2441 E. Hartford Ave., Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;50:162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
Premonitory urges are central to emerging behavioral models of chronic tic disorders (CTD). Urge reduction has been proposed as a behavioral explanation for tic maintenance and exacerbation as well as the efficacy of behavioral treatments. Prior investigations have produced inconsistent findings despite common methodologies. The current study evaluated the possibility that data aggregation obscures distinct and meaningful patterns of change in urge ratings when tics are freely expressed versus suppressed.
Participants (n = 12) included children with moderate-to-marked tic severity and noticeable premonitory urges. Tic frequencies and urge ratings were obtained at 15 s and 10-s intervals, respectively, across an alternating sequence of 10-min tic freely and 40-min tic suppression conditions. Patterns were established using a two step approach.
Five distinct patterns of urge rating change emerged, suggesting data aggregation may obscure meaningful patterns in the urge-tic relationship when tics are completed versus suppressed.
Eligibility criteria may have unintentionally excluded younger affected children and included older participants with more severe tic disorders than commonly seen. Additional research with less stringent eligibility criteria and a larger sample size will help validate the results.
The relationship between urges and tics is much more complex than previously theorized. Investigations that rely on global assessments of urge and tic severity and/or assume uniformity when aggregating participant data may obscure meaningful differences in the urge-tic relationship. Future investigations should examine the possibility that individual differences and/or developmental considerations modulate the functional urge-tic relationship.
预兆性冲动是慢性抽动障碍(CTD)新兴行为模型的核心。冲动减少已被提出作为抽动维持和加重以及行为治疗效果的行为学解释。尽管采用了共同的方法,但先前的研究结果并不一致。本研究评估了在抽动自由表达与抑制时,数据汇总是否会掩盖冲动评分中明显且有意义的变化模式的可能性。
参与者(n = 12)包括抽动严重程度为中度至重度且有明显预兆性冲动的儿童。在10分钟的抽动自由和40分钟的抽动抑制条件交替序列中,分别以15秒和10秒的间隔获取抽动频率和冲动评分。使用两步法建立模式。
出现了五种不同的冲动评分变化模式,表明在抽动完成与抑制时,数据汇总可能会掩盖冲动与抽动关系中有意义的模式。
纳入标准可能无意中排除了年龄较小的受影响儿童,并且纳入了比常见情况更严重抽动障碍的年龄较大参与者。采用不太严格的纳入标准和更大样本量的进一步研究将有助于验证结果。
冲动与抽动之间的关系比先前理论所认为的要复杂得多。依赖于对冲动和抽动严重程度进行整体评估和/或在汇总参与者数据时假设一致性的研究,可能会掩盖冲动与抽动关系中有意义的差异。未来的研究应探讨个体差异和/或发育因素调节功能性冲动与抽动关系的可能性。