Giustino Gennaro, Dangas George D
The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York.
The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;58(3):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with DM and CAD undergoing revascularization with either a surgical or a percutaneous approach are at higher risk of adverse outcomes and mortality compared with non-DM patients. It is within this background that the optimal choice of revascularization is of critical importance in this high-risk population. The large FREEDOM trial randomized 1900 patients with DM and multivessel CAD to either revascularization with coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared with PCI, CABG significantly reduced the rates of death and myocardial infarction but was associated with a higher risk of stroke. In a real-world setting the decision-making process for the optimal revascularization strategy in these patients is challenging as many clinical factors may influence the decision to either pursue a surgical or a percutaneous revascularization. However, the current consensus is that CABG should be the preferred revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with extensive multivessel CAD.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是糖尿病(DM)患者的主要死因。与非糖尿病患者相比,接受外科手术或经皮介入血管重建术的糖尿病合并CAD患者发生不良结局和死亡的风险更高。正是在这种背景下,血管重建的最佳选择对于这一高危人群至关重要。大型FREEDOM试验将1900例患有糖尿病和多支冠状动脉疾病的患者随机分为接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的血管重建组。与PCI相比,CABG显著降低了死亡率和心肌梗死发生率,但与较高的中风风险相关。在现实世界中,这些患者最佳血管重建策略的决策过程具有挑战性,因为许多临床因素可能会影响选择外科手术还是经皮血管重建术的决定。然而,目前的共识是,对于患有广泛多支冠状动脉疾病的糖尿病患者,CABG应是首选的血管重建策略。