• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本助产士主导的分娩中心分娩女性会阴裂伤的患病率:一项回顾性描述性研究。

Prevalence of Perineal Lacerations in Women Giving Birth at Midwife-Led Birth Centers in Japan: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.

作者信息

Suto Maiko, Takehara Kenji, Misago Chizuru, Matsui Mitsuaki

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;60(4):419-27. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12324.

DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12324
PMID:26255802
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Perineal lacerations during birth can cause ongoing physical, psychological, and social problems. However, the prevalence of lacerations following normal spontaneous vaginal birth in women with low-risk pregnancies is unknown. We investigated the prevalence of perineal lacerations and factors associated with lacerations among low-risk Japanese women who had normal spontaneous vaginal births.

METHODS

Pregnant women who were cared for between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2011, in 3 midwife-led birth centers in Tokyo, Japan, where invasive medical interventions are rarely applied, were included. We investigated the prevalence of perineal lacerations and conducted univariate and multivariate analyses on the relationship between the prevalence of lacerations and selected maternal and neonatal characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 1881 pregnant women had initial antenatal care at one of the 3 study sites. Of these, 1521 were eligible for inclusion. Intact perineum rates were 49.5% (209/422) and 69.9% (768/1099) in nulliparous and multiparous women, respectively. First-degree lacerations occurred in 36.7% (155/422) of nulliparous women and 27.1% (298/1099) of multiparous women, and second-degree lacerations occurred in 13.5% (57/422) of nulliparous women and 3.0% (33/1099) of multiparous women. One multiparous woman experienced a third-degree laceration (0.1%). No women suffered fourth-degree or cervical lacerations. Logistic regression analyses showed that older age (≥ 35 years), the hands-and-knees position, and using a birthing chair during birth increased the risk of perineal laceration both in nulliparous and in multiparous women. In addition, waterbirths increased the risk of perineal laceration in multiparous women.

DISCUSSION

In normal spontaneous vaginal births among a low-risk population, it is possible to avoid episiotomy and achieve a high rate of intact perineum, with few second-degree and third-degree lacerations.

摘要

引言

分娩时的会阴撕裂可导致持续的身体、心理和社会问题。然而,低风险妊娠女性正常自然阴道分娩后撕裂伤的发生率尚不清楚。我们调查了正常自然阴道分娩的低风险日本女性会阴撕裂伤的发生率以及与撕裂伤相关的因素。

方法

纳入2008年1月1日至2011年6月30日期间在日本东京3个由助产士主导的分娩中心接受护理的孕妇,这些分娩中心很少采用侵入性医疗干预措施。我们调查了会阴撕裂伤的发生率,并对撕裂伤发生率与选定的孕产妇和新生儿特征之间的关系进行了单因素和多因素分析。

结果

共有1881名孕妇在3个研究地点之一接受了初次产前护理。其中,1521名符合纳入条件。初产妇和经产妇的会阴完整率分别为49.5%(209/422)和69.9%(768/1099)。初产妇中36.7%(155/422)发生一度撕裂伤,经产妇中27.1%(298/1099)发生一度撕裂伤;初产妇中13.5%(57/422)发生二度撕裂伤,经产妇中3.0%(33/1099)发生二度撕裂伤。一名经产妇发生了三度撕裂伤(0.1%)。没有女性发生四度或宫颈撕裂伤。逻辑回归分析表明,年龄较大(≥35岁)、手膝位以及分娩时使用分娩椅会增加初产妇和经产妇会阴撕裂伤的风险。此外,水中分娩会增加经产妇会阴撕裂伤的风险。

讨论

在低风险人群的正常自然阴道分娩中,可以避免会阴切开术,并实现较高的会阴完整率,二度和三度撕裂伤较少。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Perineal Lacerations in Women Giving Birth at Midwife-Led Birth Centers in Japan: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.日本助产士主导的分娩中心分娩女性会阴裂伤的患病率:一项回顾性描述性研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;60(4):419-27. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12324.
2
Prevalence and contributing factors of severe perineal damage following episiotomy-assisted vaginal delivery.会阴切开术辅助阴道分娩后严重会阴损伤的发生率及影响因素。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):481-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.002.
3
Perineal outcomes in a home birth setting.家庭分娩环境中的会阴结局
Birth. 1998 Dec;25(4):226-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00226.x.
4
Birthing postures and birth canal lacerations.分娩姿势与产道裂伤
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 May;30(10):1243-1246. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1209654. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Getting through birth in one piece: protecting the perineum.顺产:保护会阴
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):158-64. doi: 10.1097/01.NMC.0000269565.20111.92.
6
Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study.分娩时三度和四度会阴裂伤的流行情况及危险因素:一项多国家研究。
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):340-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03210.x.
7
Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.第二产程时长及器械助产作为严重会阴裂伤的危险因素:基于人群的研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1251-6.
8
Does midwife experience affect the rate of severe perineal tears?助产士的经验会影响严重会阴撕裂的发生率吗?
Birth. 2017 Jun;44(2):161-166. doi: 10.1111/birt.12278. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Perineal injury in nulliparous women giving birth at a community hospital: reduced risk in births attended by certified nurse-midwives.社区医院初产妇会阴损伤:助产士接产可降低风险。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 May-Jun;55(3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.11.006.
10
Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.手术助产阴道分娩与会阴正中切开术:会阴的不良组合。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;195(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.078.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of manual perineal protection and pushing techniques used in the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial of combinations of strategies.分娩第二阶段使用的手动会阴保护和推挤技术对会阴结局的影响:策略组合的随机对照试验
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07564-6.
2
Episiotomy for Medical Indications during Vaginal Birth-Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors Determining the Performance of This Procedure.阴道分娩时因医学指征行会阴切开术——决定该手术实施的危险因素的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 26;11(15):4334. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154334.
3
Waterbirth: a national retrospective cohort study of factors associated with its use among women in England.
水中分娩:一项全国性回顾性队列研究,探讨了英格兰妇女使用水中分娩的相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03724-6.
4
Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study.菲律宾一所三级教学医院的循证产时实践及其相关因素:一项描述性混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2778-5.
5
Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial.选择性会阴切开术与实施非会阴切开术方案的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0315-4.