Department of Global Health, Nagasaki University School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Sakamoto 1-12-4, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Southern Philippines Medical Centre, JP Laurel Avenue, Bajada, Davao City, 8000, The Philippines.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2778-5.
Evidenced-based practice is a key component of quality care. However, studies in the Philippines have identified gaps between evidence and actual maternity practices. This study aims to describe the practice of evidence-based intrapartum care and its associated factors, as well as exploring the perceptions of healthcare providers in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines.
A mixed-methods study was conducted, which consisted of direct observation of intrapartum practices during the second and third stages, as well as semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with care providers to determine their perceptions and reasoning behind decisions to perform episiotomy or fundal pressure. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyse the relationship between observed practices and maternal, neonatal, and environmental factors. Qualitative data were parsed and categorised to identify themes related to the decision-making process.
A total of 170 deliveries were included. Recommended care, such as prophylactic use of oxytocin and controlled cord traction in the third stage, were applied in almost all the cases. However, harmful practices were also observed, such as intramuscular or intravenous oxytocin use in the second stage (14%) and lack of foetal heart rate monitoring (57%). Of primiparae, 92% received episiotomy and 31% of all deliveries received fundal pressure. Factors associated with the implementation of episiotomy included primipara (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 62.3), duration of the second stage of more than 30 min (aOR 4.6), and assisted vaginal delivery (aOR 15.0). Factors associated with fundal pressure were primipara (aOR 3.0), augmentation with oxytocin (aOR 3.3), and assisted delivery (aOR 4.8). Healthcare providers believe that these practices can prevent laceration. The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) was 17%. Associated with OASIS were assisted delivery (aOR 6.0), baby weights of more than 3.5 kg (aOR 7.8), episiotomy (aOR 26.4), and fundal pressure (aOR 6.2).
Our study found that potentially harmful practices are still conducted that contribute to the occurrence of OASIS. The perception of these practices is divergent with current evidence, and empirical knowledge has more influence. To improve practices the scientific evidence and its underlying basis should be understood among providers.
循证实践是优质护理的关键组成部分。然而,菲律宾的研究发现,证据与实际产科实践之间存在差距。本研究旨在描述菲律宾一家三级医院产时循证护理的实践情况及其相关因素,并探讨医疗保健提供者的看法。
采用混合方法研究,包括直接观察第二和第三产程的产时实践,以及对半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论的护理提供者进行访谈,以确定他们进行会阴切开术或宫底按压的看法和决策背后的原因。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析观察到的实践与产妇、新生儿和环境因素之间的关系。对定性数据进行解析和分类,以确定与决策过程相关的主题。
共纳入 170 例分娩。几乎所有情况下都采用了推荐的护理措施,如第三产程预防性使用催产素和控制脐带牵引。但也观察到了有害的做法,如第二产程中肌肉内或静脉内使用催产素(14%)和缺乏胎心监护(57%)。初产妇中,92%接受了会阴切开术,31%的分娩接受了宫底按压。会阴切开术实施的相关因素包括初产妇(调整后的优势比[aOR]62.3)、第二产程超过 30 分钟(aOR 4.6)和阴道助产(aOR 15.0)。宫底按压的相关因素包括初产妇(aOR 3.0)、催产素引产(aOR 3.3)和辅助分娩(aOR 4.8)。医疗保健提供者认为这些做法可以预防裂伤。产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的发生率为 17%。OASIS 与辅助分娩(aOR 6.0)、婴儿体重超过 3.5kg(aOR 7.8)、会阴切开术(aOR 26.4)和宫底按压(aOR 6.2)相关。
本研究发现,仍存在潜在的有害做法,这些做法导致 OASIS 的发生。这些做法的看法与当前证据不一致,实证知识的影响更大。为了改善实践,提供者应了解科学证据及其基础。