• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连接主义视角下的语言学习、表现与处理。

Connectionist perspectives on language learning, representation and processing.

机构信息

Psychology/Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 May-Jun;6(3):235-47. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1340. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/wcs.1340
PMID:26263227
Abstract

The field of formal linguistics was founded on the premise that language is mentally represented as a deterministic symbolic grammar. While this approach has captured many important characteristics of the world's languages, it has also led to a tendency to focus theoretical questions on the correct formalization of grammatical rules while also de-emphasizing the role of learning and statistics in language development and processing. In this review we present a different approach to language research that has emerged from the parallel distributed processing or 'connectionist' enterprise. In the connectionist framework, mental operations are studied by simulating learning and processing within networks of artificial neurons. With that in mind, we discuss recent progress in connectionist models of auditory word recognition, reading, morphology, and syntactic processing. We argue that connectionist models can capture many important characteristics of how language is learned, represented, and processed, as well as providing new insights about the source of these behavioral patterns. Just as importantly, the networks naturally capture irregular (non-rule-like) patterns that are common within languages, something that has been difficult to reconcile with rule-based accounts of language without positing separate mechanisms for rules and exceptions.

摘要

形式语言学领域的建立基于这样一个前提,即语言在心理上被表示为一种确定性的符号语法。虽然这种方法捕捉到了世界上许多语言的重要特征,但它也导致了一种倾向,即把理论问题的重点放在正确的语法规则形式化上,同时也淡化了学习和统计在语言发展和处理中的作用。在这篇综述中,我们提出了一种不同的语言研究方法,这种方法源自并行分布式处理或“连接主义”的研究。在连接主义框架中,通过模拟神经网络中的学习和处理来研究心理运算。有鉴于此,我们讨论了连接主义模型在听觉词识别、阅读、形态和句法处理方面的最新进展。我们认为,连接主义模型可以捕捉到语言学习、表示和处理的许多重要特征,并为这些行为模式的来源提供新的见解。同样重要的是,网络自然地捕捉到了语言中常见的不规则(非规则样)模式,这在不假定规则和例外有单独机制的情况下,很难用基于规则的语言解释来调和。

相似文献

1
Connectionist perspectives on language learning, representation and processing.连接主义视角下的语言学习、表现与处理。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 May-Jun;6(3):235-47. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1340. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
2
Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing.自然语言的神经网络处理:II. 迈向学习句子理解和非语言序列中皮质纹状体功能的统一模型。
Brain Lang. 2009 May-Jun;109(2-3):80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
3
Overregularization in language acquisition.语言习得中的过度规则化。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1992;57(4):1-182.
4
Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?当前的联结主义学习模型是否能解释不同语言中的阅读发展情况?
Cognition. 2004 Apr;91(3):273-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.006.
5
[Connectionist modeling of higher-level cognitive processes].[高级认知过程的联结主义建模]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2002 Feb;72(6):541-55. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.541.
6
How many mechanisms are needed to analyze speech? A connectionist simulation of structural rule learning in artificial language acquisition.需要多少种机制来分析语音?人工语言习得中结构规则学习的连接主义模拟。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(7):1243-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01191.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
7
Fractal analysis illuminates the form of connectionist structural gradualness.分形分析阐明了连接主义结构渐变的形式。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):634-67. doi: 10.1111/tops.12036. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
8
Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: further explorations in the microstructure of cognition.《并行分布式处理》25周年:认知微观结构的进一步探索
Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;38(6):1024-77. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12148. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
Phonology and syntax in specific language impairment: evidence from a connectionist model.特定语言障碍中的语音学和句法:来自联结主义模型的证据。
Brain Lang. 2003 Jul;86(1):40-56. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00533-3.
10
Dissociating types of mental computation.区分心理计算的类型。
Nature. 1997 Jun 5;387(6633):592-4. doi: 10.1038/42456.

引用本文的文献

1
Word Learning in Bilingual Children at Risk for Developmental Language Disorder.双语儿童在发展性语言障碍风险中的词汇学习。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Nov 4;33(6):2746-2766. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00489. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
Left and Right Arcuate Fasciculi Are Uniquely Related to Word Reading Skills in Chinese-English Bilingual Children.左右弓状束与汉英双语儿童的单词阅读技能有独特关联。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Feb 10;3(1):109-131. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00051. eCollection 2022.
3
Working memory development: A 50-year assessment of research and underlying theories.
工作记忆发展:50 年研究与基础理论评估。
Cognition. 2022 Jul;224:105075. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105075. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
AAC and Artificial Intelligence (AI).抗酸杆菌与人工智能
Top Lang Disord. 2019 Oct-Dec;39(4):389-403. doi: 10.1097/tld.0000000000000197.
5
Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.作为从语言理解和产出中浮现的言语工作记忆。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068. eCollection 2020.
6
Neural Population Dynamics and Cognitive Function.神经群体动力学与认知功能
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:50. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00050. eCollection 2020.
7
How Young Children Learn Language and Speech.幼儿如何学习语言和言语。
Pediatr Rev. 2019 Aug;40(8):398-411. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0325.
8
Influence of Grapheme and Syllable Learning on Handwriting Output of Chinese Characters in Children With Dictation Difficulties.字素和音节学习对听写困难儿童汉字书写输出的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;9:1671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01671. eCollection 2018.
9
Print-Speech Convergence Predicts Future Reading Outcomes in Early Readers.印刷-言语融合可预测早期阅读者未来的阅读成绩。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;27(1):75-84. doi: 10.1177/0956797615611921. Epub 2015 Nov 20.