• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髓内钉固定期间进行髋关节外展有助于纠正转子下骨折的残余内翻畸形吗?一项回顾性队列研究。

Does Hip Abduction during Intramedullary Nail Fixation Help Correct Residual Varus Alignment in Subtrochanteric Fractures? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kook Incheol, Gil Young Woon, Hwang Kyu Tae

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(2):194-203. doi: 10.4055/cios24271. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

DOI:10.4055/cios24271
PMID:40170780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11957815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Varus malalignment is a risk factor for nonunion and mechanical complications in subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs). Although various reduction techniques have been reported to avoid varus malalignment in SFFs, achieving anatomic reduction remains challenging, often resulting in residual varus alignment (RVA) after reduction. This study aimed to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a novel method resolving RVA by abducting the ipsilateral hip after cephalomedullary fixation with an intramedullary nail and subsequently inserting distal interlocking screws.

METHODS

This retrospective study, conducted between March 2016 and March 2022, included patients who underwent hip abduction during intramedullary nailing due to RVA. Demographics and fracture patterns (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA]) and types (typical or atypical) were analyzed. Radiographic outcomes included Baumgaertner reduction quality criteria (BRQC), tip-apex distance (TAD), neck-shaft angle (NSA), lateral cortex residual gap, union, and time to union. Clinical outcomes included ambulatory level using the Palmer-Parker Mobility Score (PPM), complications, and reoperation.

RESULTS

This study included 45 patients (mean age, 65.8 years; mean follow-up period, 18.4 months). The most common fracture pattern was 32A2 in 15 patients and 29 were typical and 16 were atypical fractures. The BRQC was good in 36 patients, and TAD was < 25 mm in 43 patients. Pre-abduction NSA (126.0° ± 3.8°) was significantly smaller than post-abduction NSA (129.9° ± 3.4°, < 0.001). Post-abduction NSA was comparable to contralateral NSA of 128.9° ± 2.8° ( = 0.155). Residual gap was significantly reduced from 6.1 ± 2.9 mm pre-abduction to 1.7 ± 1.0 mm post-abduction ( < 0.001). Union was achieved in 44 patients (97.8%; mean duration, 5.9 months). PPM decreased from 7.8 ± 2.0 pre-injury to 7.0 ± 2.1 1-year postoperatively. One nonunion case required reoperation. Radiographic outcomes did not significantly differ by fracture pattern ( = 0.470 for NSA and = 0.334 for residual gap).

CONCLUSIONS

Hip abduction during intramedullary nailing corrects alignment and reduces the gap in SFFs with residual varus alignment. This method can be applied to various fracture patterns in a straightforward manner and considered valuable for managing SFFs.

摘要

背景

内翻畸形是股骨转子下骨折(SFFs)不愈合和机械并发症的危险因素。尽管已有多种复位技术报道可避免SFFs出现内翻畸形,但实现解剖复位仍具有挑战性,复位后常导致残余内翻畸形(RVA)。本研究旨在探讨一种新方法的影像学和临床疗效,该方法是在使用髓内钉进行头髓内固定后外展同侧髋关节,随后插入远端交锁螺钉来解决RVA。

方法

本回顾性研究在2016年3月至2022年3月期间进行,纳入因RVA在髓内钉固定期间进行髋关节外展的患者。分析人口统计学资料、骨折类型( Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/骨科创伤协会[AO/OTA])和类型(典型或非典型)。影像学结果包括鲍姆加特纳复位质量标准(BRQC)、尖顶距(TAD)、颈干角(NSA)、外侧皮质残余间隙、愈合情况及愈合时间。临床结果包括使用帕尔默 - 帕克活动评分(PPM)评估的活动水平、并发症及再次手术情况。

结果

本研究纳入45例患者(平均年龄65.8岁;平均随访期18.4个月)。最常见的骨折类型是15例患者为32A2型,29例为典型骨折,16例为非典型骨折。36例患者BRQC良好,43例患者TAD<25 mm。外展前NSA(126.0°±3.8°)显著小于外展后NSA(129.9°±3.4°,P<0.001)。外展后NSA与对侧NSA的128.9°±2.8°相当(P = 0.155)。残余间隙从外展前的6.1±2.9 mm显著减小至外展后的1.7±1.0 mm(P<0.001)。44例患者(97.8%)实现愈合(平均持续时间5.9个月)。PPM从伤前的7.8±2.0降至术后1年的7.0±2.1。1例不愈合病例需要再次手术。影像学结果在骨折类型之间无显著差异(NSA的P = 0.470,残余间隙的P = 0.334)。

结论

髓内钉固定期间进行髋关节外展可纠正SFFs伴残余内翻畸形的对线并减小间隙。该方法可直接应用于各种骨折类型,并被认为对SFFs的治疗具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/20f29fd48eb9/cios-17-194-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/c474dae7962d/cios-17-194-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/70159cf3b373/cios-17-194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/20f29fd48eb9/cios-17-194-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/c474dae7962d/cios-17-194-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/70159cf3b373/cios-17-194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e16/11957815/20f29fd48eb9/cios-17-194-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Hip Abduction during Intramedullary Nail Fixation Help Correct Residual Varus Alignment in Subtrochanteric Fractures? A Retrospective Cohort Study.髓内钉固定期间进行髋关节外展有助于纠正转子下骨折的残余内翻畸形吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(2):194-203. doi: 10.4055/cios24271. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
Risk Factors for Early Implant Failure in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Twin Interlocking Derotation and Compression Screw Cephalomedullary Nail (InterTAN).老年转子间骨折采用双锁定防旋及加压螺钉股骨近端髓内钉(InterTAN)治疗后早期发生植入物失败的风险因素。
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(5):289-295. doi: 10.55095/ACHOT2024/054.
3
A Good Tip-Apex Distance Does Not Make Up For a Poor Reduction in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures Treated with an Cephalomedullary Nail: The Utility of the Neck-Shaft Angle in Preventing Fixation Failure.良好的尖顶距并不能弥补股骨粗隆间骨折采用髓内钉治疗时复位不良的问题:颈干角在预防内固定失败中的作用。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jan 15;32(2):83-91. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00972. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Medium-Term Outcomes of a Forward-Striking Technique to Reduce Fracture Gaps during Long Cephalomedullary Nailing in Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures.顺行打入技术减少股骨转子下骨折髓内钉固定骨折间隙的中期结果。
Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3423-3429. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.031. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.使用髓内髋螺钉治疗反斜型股骨粗隆间骨折。
J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):852-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802b9559.
6
Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants.转子下股骨骨折和髓内钉并发症:两种植入物的比较。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00645-8.
7
An overview of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with proximal femoral nail fixation using important criteria.使用重要标准对采用股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗的股骨粗隆间骨折患者进行概述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 20;25(1):1051. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08197-0.
8
Mechanical Complications of Proximal Femur Fractures Treated with Intramedullary Nailing: A Retrospective Study.髓内钉治疗股骨近端骨折的机械并发症:一项回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 26;60(5):718. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050718.
9
Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.随机、前瞻性比较钢板与髓内钉固定治疗胫骨骨干远端骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Dec;25(12):736-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709.
10
Low filling ratio of the distal nail segment to the medullary canal is a risk factor for loss of anteromedial cortical support: a case control study.远节指骨骨段在髓腔内填充不足是失去前内侧皮质支撑的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02921-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants.转子下股骨骨折和髓内钉并发症:两种植入物的比较。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00645-8.
2
The Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Clamp-Assisted Reduction and Open Reduction with Wire Cerclage for Unstable Subtrochanteric Fractures.微创夹辅助复位与钢丝环扎切开复位治疗不稳定型转子下骨折的临床疗效。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 25;2022:5340504. doi: 10.1155/2022/5340504. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and Validation of a Post-Operative Non-Union Risk Score for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures.
股骨转子下骨折术后骨不连风险评分的开发与验证
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 29;10(23):5632. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235632.
4
Management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: is open reduction associated with poor outcomes?股骨转子下骨折的治疗:切开复位是否与不良结局相关?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):1759-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01834-6. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Should Pertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures Be Treated with a Short or Long Intramedullary Nail?: A Multicenter Cohort Study.股骨转子间骨折和转子下骨折应采用短髓内钉还是长髓内钉治疗?一项多中心队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 15;103(24):2291-2298. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01904.
6
Patient Positioning for Proximal Femur Fracture Fixation: a Review of Best Practices.股骨近端骨折固定的患者体位:最佳实践综述
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Aug;14(4):272-281. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09710-x. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
7
Subtrochanteric femur fractures: current review of management.股骨转子下骨折:当前治疗综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):145-151. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200048. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
Management of subtrochanteric fractures by nail osteosynthesis: a review of tips and tricks.股骨转子下骨折的钉内固定治疗:技巧与窍门综述。
Int Orthop. 2020 Apr;44(4):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04404-z. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
9
Risk factor analysis for delayed union after subtrochanteric femur fracture: quality of reduction and valgization are the key to success.转子下股骨骨折延迟愈合的风险因素分析:复位质量和内翻是成功的关键。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 31;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2775-x.
10
Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.股骨转子下骨折髓内钉固定术后骨不连的危险因素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Jun;139(6):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03131-9. Epub 2019 Feb 7.