Cortes-Puentes Gustavo A, Gard Kenneth, Keenan Joseph C, Adams Alexander, Dries David, Marini John J
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Regions Hospital, 640 Jackson St., Saint Paul, MN, 55101, USA,
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2014 Dec;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2197-425X-2-4. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Ventilated patients with asymmetry of lung or chest wall mechanics may be vulnerable to differing lung stresses or strains dependent on body position. Our purpose was to examine transpulmonary pressure (P TP) and end-expiratory lung volume (functional residual capacity (FRC)) during body positioning changes in an animal model under the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or experimental pleural effusion (PLEF).
Fourteen deeply anesthetized swine were studied including tracheostomy, thoracostomy, and esophageal catheter placement. Animals were ventilated at V T = 10 ml/kg, frequency of 15, I/E = 1:2, and FIO2 = 0.5. The animals were randomized to supine, prone, right lateral, left lateral, and semi-Fowler positions with a PEEP of 1 cm H2O (PEEP1) or a PEEP of 10 cm H2O (PEEP10) applied. Experimental PLEF was generated by 10 ml/kg saline instilled into either pleural space. P TP and FRC were determined in each condition.
No significant differences in FRC were found among the four horizontal positions. Compared to horizontal positioning, semi-Fowler's increased FRC (p < 0.001) by 56% at PEEP1 and 54% at PEEP10 without PLEF and by 131% at PEEP1 and 98% at PEEP10 with PLEF. Inspiratory or expiratory P TP showed insignificant differences across positions at both levels of PEEP. Consistently negative end-expiratory P TP at PEEP1 increased to positive values with PEEP10.
FRC did not differ among horizontal positions; however, semi-Fowler's positioning significantly raised FRC. P TP proved insensitive to mechanical asymmetry. While end-expiratory P TP was negative at PEEP1, applying PEEP10 caused a transition to positive P TP, suggestive of reopening of initially compressed lung units.
肺部或胸壁力学不对称的机械通气患者可能因体位不同而承受不同的肺应力或应变。我们的目的是在呼气末正压(PEEP)或实验性胸腔积液(PLEF)影响下,在动物模型中研究体位改变期间的跨肺压(P TP)和呼气末肺容积(功能残气量(FRC))。
对14只深度麻醉的猪进行研究,包括气管切开术、胸腔造口术和食管导管置入。动物以潮气量(V T)=10 ml/kg、频率15、吸呼比(I/E)=1:2和吸入氧分数(FIO2)=0.5进行通气。将动物随机分为仰卧位、俯卧位、右侧卧位、左侧卧位和半福勒位,施加1 cm H2O的PEEP(PEEP1)或10 cm H2O的PEEP(PEEP10)。通过向任一胸腔内注入10 ml/kg生理盐水产生实验性PLEF。在每种情况下测定P TP和FRC。
四个水平位之间的FRC无显著差异。与水平位相比,在无PLEF时,半福勒位在PEEP1时使FRC增加56%,在PEEP10时增加54%;在有PLEF时,在PEEP1时增加131%,在PEEP10时增加98%。在两个PEEP水平下,吸气或呼气P TP在各体位间均无显著差异。在PEEP1时持续为负的呼气末P TP在PEEP10时变为正值。
水平位之间的FRC无差异;然而,半福勒位显著提高了FRC。P TP对机械不对称不敏感。虽然在PEEP1时呼气末P TP为负,但施加PEEP10会导致其转变为正P TP,提示最初受压的肺单位重新开放。