Petersen Morten Aa, Aaronson Neil K, Chie Wei-Chu, Conroy Thierry, Costantini Anna, Hammerlid Eva, Hjermstad Marianne J, Kaasa Stein, Loge Jon H, Velikova Galina, Young Teresa, Groenvold Mogens
The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1069-5. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
Patient-reported outcomes should ideally be adapted to the individual patient while maintaining comparability of scores across patients. This is achievable using computerized adaptive testing (CAT). The aim here was to develop an item bank for CAT measurement of the pain domain as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
The development process consisted of four steps: (1) literature search, (2) formulation of new items and expert evaluations, (3) pretesting and (4) field-testing and psychometric analyses for the final selection of items.
In step 1, we identified 337 pain items from the literature. Twenty-nine new items fitting the QLQ-C30 item style were formulated in step 2 that were reduced to 26 items by expert evaluations. Based on interviews with 31 patients from Denmark, France and the UK, the list was further reduced to 21 items in step 3. In phase 4, responses were obtained from 1103 cancer patients from five countries. Psychometric evaluations showed that 16 items could be retained in a unidimensional item bank. Evaluations indicated that use of the CAT measure may reduce sample size requirements with 15-25% compared to using the QLQ-C30 pain scale.
We have established an item bank of 16 items suitable for CAT measurement of pain. While being backward compatible with the QLQ-C30, the new item bank will significantly improve measurement precision of pain. We recommend initiating CAT measurement by screening for pain using the two original QLQ-C30 pain items. The EORTC pain CAT is currently available for "experimental" purposes.
患者报告的结果理想情况下应根据个体患者进行调整,同时保持患者之间得分的可比性。使用计算机自适应测试(CAT)可以实现这一点。本文的目的是开发一个项目库,用于通过欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)对疼痛领域进行CAT测量。
开发过程包括四个步骤:(1)文献检索,(2)新条目的制定和专家评估,(3)预测试,以及(4)现场测试和心理测量分析以最终选择条目。
在步骤1中,我们从文献中识别出337个疼痛条目。在步骤2中制定了29个符合QLQ-C30条目风格的新条目,经专家评估后减少到26个条目。基于对来自丹麦、法国和英国的31名患者的访谈,在步骤3中该列表进一步减少到21个条目。在第4阶段,从五个国家的1103名癌症患者那里获得了反馈。心理测量评估表明,16个条目可以保留在一个单维项目库中。评估表明,与使用QLQ-C30疼痛量表相比,使用CAT测量可能会将样本量要求降低15%-25%。
我们建立了一个包含16个条目的项目库,适用于对疼痛进行CAT测量。新的项目库在与QLQ-C30向后兼容的同时,将显著提高疼痛测量的精度。我们建议通过使用两个原始的QLQ-C30疼痛条目筛查疼痛来启动CAT测量。EORTC疼痛CAT目前可用于“实验”目的。