• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性与原发性激素受体阳性/HER2阴性转移性乳腺癌的成本与死亡率

Costs and mortality of recurrent versus de novo hormone receptor-positive/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer.

作者信息

Engel-Nitz Nicole M, Hao Yanni, Becker Laura K, Gerdes Randall

机构信息

Senior Researcher, Optum, Health Economics & Outcomes Research, 12125 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):303-14. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.19.

DOI:10.2217/cer.15.19
PMID:26274792
Abstract

AIM

To examine cost and mortality differences in postmenopausal women with HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

Using claims data (2007-2013), women with newly diagnosed (de novo) stage IV, or early- or late-recurring metastatic breast cancer were identified.

RESULTS

Compared with de novo (n = 121) and late-recurrent (n = 106), early-recurrent (n = 172) patients had significantly higher costs in total and for anticancer systemic agents. Adjusted per patient per month costs for early-recurrent patients were US$13,404, versus US$9955 (de novo) and US$9721 (late-recurrent; p = 0.02). Early-recurrent patients' risk of death was twice that of de novo patients (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Compared with new diagnosis or late recurrence, early recurrence of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer was associated with higher mortality and healthcare costs.

摘要

目的

研究绝经后HR(+)/HER2(-)晚期乳腺癌患者的成本和死亡率差异。

方法

利用索赔数据(2007 - 2013年),确定新诊断(初发)IV期、早期或晚期复发性转移性乳腺癌患者。

结果

与初发患者(n = 121)和晚期复发患者(n = 106)相比,早期复发患者(n = 172)的总成本和抗癌全身用药成本显著更高。早期复发患者调整后的人均每月成本为13404美元,而初发患者为9955美元,晚期复发患者为9721美元(p = 0.02)。早期复发患者的死亡风险是初发患者的两倍(p = 0.02)。

结论

与新诊断或晚期复发相比,HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌的早期复发与更高的死亡率和医疗成本相关。

相似文献

1
Costs and mortality of recurrent versus de novo hormone receptor-positive/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer.复发性与原发性激素受体阳性/HER2阴性转移性乳腺癌的成本与死亡率
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):303-14. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.19.
2
Clinical outcome in women with HER2-positive de novo or recurring stage IV breast cancer receiving trastuzumab-based therapy.曲妥珠单抗为基础的治疗用于 HER2 阳性初治或复发的 IV 期乳腺癌女性的临床结局。
Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
3
Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IV or Recurrent Disease Undergoing First-line Trastuzumab-based Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.接受一线曲妥珠单抗为基础治疗的新诊断 IV 期或复发性 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者的治疗模式和临床结局:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Dec;17(8):601-610.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Healthcare Costs in the Targeted-Therapy Age.人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性转移性乳腺癌:靶向治疗时代医疗成本的回顾性队列研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1632-1645. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01283-4. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
5
Comparison of medical costs and healthcare resource utilization of post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving everolimus-based therapy or chemotherapy: a retrospective claims database analysis.接受依维莫司治疗或化疗的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌绝经后妇女的医疗费用和医疗资源利用情况比较:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
J Med Econ. 2016;19(4):414-23. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1131704.
6
Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?转移性乳腺癌的预后:初发性和复发性转移性乳腺癌患者之间存在差异吗?
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1445-51. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.127. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
7
Patient survival and healthcare utilization costs after diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer in a United States managed care cancer registry.美国管理式医疗癌症注册中心中三阴性乳腺癌患者的诊断后生存状况和医疗保健利用成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Mar;28(3):419-28. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.628649. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type for Patients With Recurrent and De Novo Advanced Cancer.复发性和新发晚期癌症患者按服务类型划分的医疗费用模式。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Clinical outcomes and metastatic behavior between de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A 17-year single-institution cohort study at Taipei Veterans General Hospital.HER2阳性原发性与复发性转移性乳腺癌的临床结局和转移行为:台北荣民总医院一项为期17年的单机构队列研究。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;85(1):88-94. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000622.
10
Incidence-based cost-of-illness model for metastatic breast cancer in the United States.美国转移性乳腺癌基于发病率的疾病成本模型。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):12-21. doi: 10.1017/S026646231100064X.

引用本文的文献

1
Spending for Advanced Cancer Diagnoses: Comparing Recurrent Versus De Novo Stage IV Disease.晚期癌症诊断支出:复发与初诊 IV 期疾病比较。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jul;15(7):e616-e627. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00004. Epub 2019 May 20.
2
U.S. prevalence of endocrine therapy-naïve locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.美国内分泌治疗初治局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌的流行情况。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e180-e187. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4163. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
3
Medical Care Costs for Recurrent versus De Novo Stage IV Cancer by Age at Diagnosis.
复发型与初发型IV期癌症的医疗费用与诊断时年龄的关系
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):5106-5128. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13014. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Comparing Survival After Recurrent vs De Novo Stage IV Advanced Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer.复发性与原发性IV期晚期乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者生存率比较
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Apr;2(2):pky024. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky024. Epub 2018 Jun 28.