Wang Laura Y, Roman Benjamin R, Migliacci Jocelyn C, Palmer Frank L, Tuttle R Michael, Shaha Ashok R, Shah Jatin P, Patel Snehal G, Ganly Ian
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Endocrine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cancer. 2015 Dec 1;121(23):4132-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29633. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
The recent overdiagnosis of subclinical, low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) coincides with a growing national interest in cost-effective health care practices. The aim of this study was to measure the relative cost-effectiveness of disease surveillance of low-risk PTC patients versus intermediate- and high-risk patients in accordance with American Thyroid Association risk categories.
Two thousand nine hundred thirty-two patients who underwent thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer between 2000 and 2010 were identified from the institutional database; 1845 patients were excluded because they had non-PTC cancer, underwent less than total thyroidectomy, had a secondary cancer, or had <36 months of follow-up. In total, 1087 were included for analysis. The numbers of postoperative blood tests, imaging scans and biopsies, clinician office visits, and recurrence events were recorded for the first 36 months of follow-up. Costs of surveillance were determined with the Physician Fee Schedule and Clinical Lab Fee Schedule of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The median age was 44 years (range, 7-83 years). In the first 36 months after thyroidectomy, there were 3, 44, and 22 recurrences (0.8%, 7.8%, and 13.4%) in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively. The cost of surveillance for each recurrence detected was US $147,819, US $22,434, and US $20,680, respectively.
The cost to detect a recurrence in a low-risk patient is more than 6 and 7 times greater than the cost for intermediate- and high-risk PTC patients. It is difficult to justify this allocation of resources to the surveillance of low-risk patients. Surveillance strategies for the low-risk group should, therefore, be restructured.
亚临床低风险甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)近期的过度诊断与全国对具有成本效益的医疗保健实践的兴趣日益增加相吻合。本研究的目的是根据美国甲状腺协会的风险类别,衡量低风险PTC患者与中高风险患者疾病监测的相对成本效益。
从机构数据库中识别出2000年至2010年间因分化型甲状腺癌接受甲状腺切除术的2932例患者;1845例患者被排除,因为他们患有非PTC癌、接受的甲状腺切除术少于全切除术、患有继发性癌症或随访时间不足36个月。总共1087例患者纳入分析。记录随访的前36个月内术后血液检查、影像学扫描和活检、临床医生门诊就诊以及复发事件的数量。监测成本根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医师费用表和临床实验室费用表确定。
中位年龄为44岁(范围7 - 83岁)。在甲状腺切除术后的前36个月,低、中、高风险类别分别有3例、44例和22例复发(0.8%、7.8%和13.4%)。检测到的每次复发的监测成本分别为147,819美元、22,434美元和20,680美元。
检测低风险患者复发的成本比中高风险PTC患者的成本高出6倍和7倍以上。将资源如此分配用于低风险患者的监测难以自圆其说。因此,应重新调整低风险组的监测策略。