Gounder Mrinal M, Nayak Lakshmi, Sahebjam Solmaz, Muzikansky Alona, Sanchez Armando J, Desideri Serena, Ye Xiaobu, Ivy S Percy, Nabors L Burt, Prados Michael, Grossman Stuart, DeAngelis Lisa M, Wen Patrick Y
Mrinal M. Gounder, Armando J. Sanchez, and Lisa M. DeAngelis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weil Cornell Medical School, New York, NY; Lakshmi Nayak and Patrick Y. Wen, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School; Alona Muzikansky, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Solmaz Sahebjam, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Serena Desideri, Xiaobu Ye, and Stuart Grossman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore; S. Percy Ivy, National Cancer Institute, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, MD; L. Burt Nabors, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and Michael Prados, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3186-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1525. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
Patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG) are frequently excluded from first-in-human solid tumor trials because of perceived poor prognosis, excessive toxicities, concomitant drug interactions, and poor efficacy. We conducted an analysis of outcomes from select, single-agent phase I studies in patients with HGG. We compared outcomes to pooled analysis of published studies in solid tumors with various molecular and cytotoxic drugs evaluated as single agents or as combinations.
Individual records of patients with recurrent HGG enrolled onto Adult Brain Tumor Consortium trials of single-agent, cytotoxic or molecular agents from 2000 to 2008 were analyzed for baseline characteristics, toxicities, responses, and survival.
Our analysis included 327 patients with advanced, refractory HGG who were enrolled onto eight trials involving targeted molecular (n=5) and cytotoxic (n=3) therapies. At enrollment, patients had a median Karnofsky performance score of 90 and median age of 52 years; 62% were men, 63% had glioblastoma, and the median number of prior systemic chemotherapies was one. Baseline laboratory values were in an acceptable range to meet eligibility criteria. Patients were on the study for a median of two cycles (range, <one to 56 cycles), and 96% were evaluable for primary end points. During cycle 1, grade≥3 nonhematologic and grade≥4 hematologic toxicities were 5% (28 of 565 adverse events) and 0.9% (five of 565 adverse events), respectively, and 66% of these occurred at the highest dose level. There was one death attributed to drug. Overall response rate (complete and partial response) was 5.5%. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 1.8 and 6 months, respectively.
Patients with HGG who meet standard eligibility criteria may be good candidates for solid tumor phase I studies with single-agent molecular or cytotoxic drugs with favorable preclinical rationale and pharmacokinetic properties in this population.
由于预后不良、毒性过大、药物相互作用以及疗效不佳等因素,高级别胶质瘤(HGG)患者常被排除在实体瘤首次人体试验之外。我们对部分HGG患者的单药I期研究结果进行了分析。我们将这些结果与已发表的关于实体瘤的研究汇总分析进行了比较,这些研究评估了各种分子药物和细胞毒性药物作为单药或联合用药的情况。
分析了2000年至2008年参加成人脑肿瘤协会单药、细胞毒性或分子药物试验的复发性HGG患者的个体记录,以了解其基线特征、毒性、反应和生存情况。
我们的分析纳入了327例晚期难治性HGG患者,他们参加了八项试验,涉及靶向分子治疗(n = 5)和细胞毒性治疗(n = 3)。入组时,患者的卡诺夫斯基功能状态评分中位数为90,年龄中位数为52岁;62%为男性,63%患有胶质母细胞瘤,既往全身化疗的中位数次数为1次。基线实验室值在可接受范围内,符合入选标准。患者的中位研究周期数为两个周期(范围:<1至56个周期),96%的患者可评估主要终点。在第1周期,≥3级非血液学毒性和≥4级血液学毒性分别为5%(565例不良事件中的28例)和0.9%(565例不良事件中的5例),其中66%发生在最高剂量水平。有1例死亡归因于药物。总体缓解率(完全缓解和部分缓解)为5.5%。无进展生存期和总生存期的中位数分别为1.8个月和6个月。
符合标准入选标准的HGG患者可能是实体瘤I期研究的合适人选,这些研究使用具有良好临床前理论依据和药代动力学特性的单药分子或细胞毒性药物。