Suppr超能文献

微孢子虫属(微孢子虫纲:微孢子虫科)感染对蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)抵御狄斯瓦螨(中气门螨目:瓦螨科)的影响。

The influence of Nosema (Microspora: Nosematidae) infection on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) defense against Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae).

作者信息

Bahreini Rassol, Currie Robert W

机构信息

Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.

出版信息

J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Nov;132:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to quantify the costs and benefits of co-parasitism with Varroa (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman) and Nosema (Nosema ceranae Fries and Nosema apis Zander) on honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) with different defense levels. Newly-emerged worker bees from either high-mite-mortality-rate (high-MMR) bees or low-mite-mortality-rate (low-MMR) bees were confined in forty bioassay cages which were either inoculated with Nosema spores [Nosema (+) group] or were left un-inoculated [Nosema (-) group]. Caged-bees were then inoculated with Varroa mites [Varroa (+) group] or were left untreated [Varroa (-) group]. This established four treatment combinations within each Nosema treatment group: (1) low-MMR Varroa (-), (2) high-MMR Varroa (-), (3) low-MMR Varroa (+) and (4) high-MMR Varroa (+), each with five replicates. Overall mite mortality in high-MMR bees (0.12±0.02 mites per day) was significantly greater than in the low-MMR bees (0.06±0.02 mites per day). In the Nosema (-) groups bee mortality was greater in high-MMR bees than low-MMR bees but only when bees had a higher mite burden. Overall, high-MMR bees in the Nosema (-) group showed greater reductions in mean abundance of mites over time compared with low-MMR bees, when inoculated with additional mites. However, high-MMR bees could not reduce mite load as well as in the Nosema (-) group when fed with Nosema spores. Mean abundance of Nosema spores in live bees and dead bees of both strains of bees was significantly greater in the Nosema (+) group. Molecular analyses confirmed the presence of both Nosema species in inoculated bees but N. ceranae was more abundant than N. apis and unlike N. apis increased over the course of the experiment. Collectively, this study showed differential mite mortality rates among different genotypes of bees, however, Nosema infection restrained Varroa removal success in high-MMR bees.

摘要

本研究的目的是量化与瓦螨(狄斯瓦螨,Anderson和Trueman)以及微孢子虫(蜜蜂微孢子虫,Fries和apis Zander)共寄生对具有不同防御水平的蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的成本和收益。来自高螨死亡率(高MMR)蜜蜂或低螨死亡率(低MMR)蜜蜂的新羽化工蜂被关在40个生物测定笼中,这些笼子要么接种了微孢子虫孢子[微孢子虫(+)组],要么未接种[微孢子虫(-)组]。然后将笼中的蜜蜂接种瓦螨[瓦螨(+)组]或不进行处理[瓦螨(-)组]。这在每个微孢子虫处理组中建立了四种处理组合:(1)低MMR瓦螨(-),(2)高MMR瓦螨(-),(3)低MMR瓦螨(+)和(4)高MMR瓦螨(+),每组有五个重复。高MMR蜜蜂的总体螨死亡率(每天0.12±0.02只螨)显著高于低MMR蜜蜂(每天0.06±0.02只螨)。在微孢子虫(-)组中,高MMR蜜蜂的死亡率高于低MMR蜜蜂,但仅当蜜蜂有更高的螨负荷时才如此。总体而言,与低MMR蜜蜂相比,微孢子虫(-)组中的高MMR蜜蜂在接种额外螨后,随着时间的推移螨的平均丰度下降幅度更大。然而,当用微孢子虫孢子喂养时,高MMR蜜蜂不能像在微孢子虫(-)组中那样降低螨负荷。在微孢子虫(+)组中,两种蜜蜂的活蜂和死蜂中的微孢子虫孢子平均丰度均显著更高。分子分析证实接种的蜜蜂中存在两种微孢子虫,但中华蜜蜂微孢子虫比蜜蜂微孢子虫更丰富,并且与蜜蜂微孢子虫不同,它在实验过程中增加。总体而言,本研究表明不同基因型蜜蜂之间的螨死亡率存在差异,然而,微孢子虫感染抑制了高MMR蜜蜂清除瓦螨的成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验