Bahreini Rassol, Nasr Medhat, Docherty Cassandra, Feindel David, Muirhead Samantha, de Herdt Olivia
Plant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250594. eCollection 2021.
Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, is an ectoparasitic mite of honey bees, Apis mellifera L., that has been considered a major cause of colony losses. Synthetic miticides have been developed and registered to manage this ectoparasite, however, resistance to registered pyrethroid and organophosphate Varroacides have already been reported in Canada. To test toxicity of miticides, current contact-based bioassay methods are designed to evaluate mites and bees separately, however, these methods are unlikely to give an accurate depiction of how miticides interact at the colony level. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a bioassay cage for testing the toxicity of miticides on honey bees and Varroa mites simultaneously using amitraz as a reference chemical. A 800 mL polypropylene plastic cage holding 100-150 bees was designed and officially named "Apiarium". A comparison of the effects of three subsequent dilutions of amitraz was conducted on: Varroa mites placed in glass vials, honey bees in glass Mason jars, and Varroa-infested bees in Apiariums. Our results indicated cumulative Varroa mortality was dose-dependent in the Apiarium after 4 h and 24 h assessments. Apiarium and glass vial treatments at 24 h also had high mite mortality and a positive polynomial regression between Varroa mortality and amitraz dose rates. Moreover, chemical application in the Apiarium was less toxic for bees compared to the Mason jar method. Considering these results, the Apiarium bioassay provides a simple, cheap and reliable method for simultaneous chemical screening on V. destructor and A. mellifera. Furthermore, as mites and bees are tested together, the Apiarium simulates a colony-like environment that provides a necessary bridge between laboratory bioassay testing and full field experimentation. The versatility of the Apiarium allows researchers to test a multitude of different honey bee bioassay experiments including miticide screening, delivery methods for chemical products, or development of new mite resistance-testing methodology.
狄斯瓦螨(Anderson和Trueman命名)是西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)的一种体外寄生螨,被认为是蜂群损失的主要原因。人们已研发并注册了合成杀螨剂来防治这种体外寄生虫,然而,加拿大已报道西方蜜蜂对已注册的拟除虫菊酯类和有机磷类杀螨剂产生了抗性。为测试杀螨剂的毒性,当前基于接触的生物测定方法旨在分别评估螨和蜜蜂,但这些方法不太可能准确描述杀螨剂在蜂群层面的相互作用方式。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种生物测定笼,以双甲脒作为参考化学品,同时测试杀螨剂对蜜蜂和狄斯瓦螨的毒性。设计了一个容纳100 - 150只蜜蜂的800毫升聚丙烯塑料笼,并正式命名为“蜂箱”。对双甲脒的三种后续稀释液的效果进行了比较,分别作用于:置于玻璃瓶中的狄斯瓦螨、置于玻璃梅森罐中的蜜蜂以及蜂箱中感染狄斯瓦螨的蜜蜂。我们的结果表明,在4小时和24小时评估后,蜂箱中狄斯瓦螨的累积死亡率呈剂量依赖性。24小时时,蜂箱和玻璃瓶处理的螨死亡率也很高,且狄斯瓦螨死亡率与双甲脒剂量率之间存在正多项式回归。此外, 与梅森罐方法相比,在蜂箱中施用化学品对蜜蜂的毒性较小。考虑到这些结果,蜂箱生物测定为同时对狄斯瓦螨和西方蜜蜂进行化学筛选提供了一种简单、廉价且可靠的方法。此外,由于螨和蜜蜂是一起测试的,蜂箱模拟了类似蜂群的环境,在实验室生物测定测试和全田间试验之间提供了必要的桥梁。蜂箱的多功能性使研究人员能够测试多种不同的蜜蜂生物测定实验,包括杀螨剂筛选、化学产品的给药方法或新的抗螨测试方法的开发。