Shimizu Kozo, Yamatani Yuya, Nogi Akihiro, Okamoto Toshinari
Central Division of Radiology, Nara Medical University Hospital.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2015 Aug;71(8):678-84. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.8.678.
The most common methods to determine the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are based on the signal statistics in regions of interest (ROIs) in a magnitude image. For this, methods to calculate the ROI have still several discussions; we assumed SNR of a magnitude image could be estimated from standard deviation of a phase image (the phase method). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of the phase method to determine the SNR. The simulation using digital phantom was carried out for evaluation of the effect to measure SNR; fluctuation in the phase image and SNR of the magnitude image. The phantom study was also performed for evaluation of the validity of estimation using the phase method in comparison with the conventional method (the identical ROI method and the subtraction method). The result of the simulation showed that SNR of magnitude image is larger than 4 for the SNR measurement using the phase method and this results reliable. The influence of fluctuation of the phase image should be eliminated for practical purposes. In the phantom study, phase method showed similar results compared to conventional methods in condition with elimination of the fluctuation of the phase image. Though there was a difference in the results of the phase method and the subtraction method according to the position of the ROI, the error was less than 4%. In this study, the method using the phase image to determine the SNR was identified as valuable.
确定磁共振成像(MRI)信噪比(SNR)的最常用方法是基于幅度图像中感兴趣区域(ROI)的信号统计。为此,计算ROI的方法仍存在一些争议;我们假设可以从相位图像的标准差估计幅度图像的SNR(相位法)。本研究的目的是评估相位法确定SNR的有效性。使用数字体模进行模拟,以评估测量SNR的效果;相位图像的波动和幅度图像的SNR。还进行了体模研究,以评估与传统方法(相同ROI法和减法法)相比,使用相位法进行估计的有效性。模拟结果表明,使用相位法进行SNR测量时,幅度图像的SNR大于4,结果可靠。出于实际目的,应消除相位图像波动的影响。在体模研究中,在消除相位图像波动的条件下,相位法与传统方法显示出相似的结果。尽管根据ROI的位置,相位法和减法法的结果存在差异,但误差小于4%。在本研究中,使用相位图像确定SNR的方法被认为是有价值的。