LaMattina J C, Kelly P J, Hanish S I, Ottmann S E, Powell J M, Hutson W R, Sivaraman V, Udekwu O, Barth R N
Division of Transplantation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Division of Transplantation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Transplant Proc. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(6):1901-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.05.005.
We have aggressively used continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) on high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score liver transplant patients with acute kidney injury and hypothesized that the addition of intraoperative CVVH therapy would improve overall outcomes.
We performed a retrospective review of all adult, single organ, liver transplant recipients requiring preoperative renal replacement therapy between January 1, 2011 and June 1, 2013. Intraoperative and perioperative records and laboratory values were collected and used to create a database of these patients. Patients were grouped according to whether or not they underwent CVVH at the time of liver transplantation.
Twenty-one patients with new-onset renal failure requiring preoperative renal replacement therapy received a liver transplant alone. Fourteen received intraoperative CVVH and 7 patients did not. The average MELD score was similar between groups (34 for intraoperative CVVH vs 35; P = .8). Preoperative sodium and potassium were higher for the group receiving intraoperative CVVH, but still fell within normal ranges. Preoperative lactate levels were higher in the group that received intraoperative CVVH (4.7 vs 2.0 mmol/L; P = .01). Intraoperative CVVH did not decrease intraoperative transfusion requirements or intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay. Differences in reoperative rates did not reach statistical significance. All patients were weaned off renal replacement therapy. One-year patient survival rate was 86% for intraoperative CVVH versus 71% without.
The judicious use of intraoperative CVVH therapy may permit patients with increasing severity of illness to achieve outcomes comparable with less ill patients.
我们积极地对终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分高且合并急性肾损伤的肝移植患者采用持续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)高剂量模式,并推测术中增加CVVH治疗可改善总体预后。
我们对2011年1月1日至2013年6月1日期间所有需要术前肾脏替代治疗的成年单器官肝移植受者进行了回顾性研究。收集术中及围手术期记录和实验室值,用于建立这些患者的数据库。根据肝移植时是否接受CVVH将患者分组。
21例新发肾衰竭且需要术前肾脏替代治疗的患者仅接受了肝移植。14例接受了术中CVVH,7例未接受。两组间平均MELD评分相似(术中CVVH组为34,未接受组为35;P = 0.8)。接受术中CVVH的组术前钠和钾水平较高,但仍在正常范围内。接受术中CVVH的组术前乳酸水平较高(4.7 vs 2.0 mmol/L;P = 0.01)。术中CVVH并未减少术中输血需求或重症监护病房(ICU)及住院时间。再次手术率的差异未达到统计学意义。所有患者均停用了肾脏替代治疗。术中接受CVVH的患者1年生存率为86%,未接受者为71%。
明智地使用术中CVVH治疗可能使病情较重的患者获得与病情较轻患者相当的预后。