Suppr超能文献

在常规腹部盆腔CT上鉴别深静脉血栓形成与股静脉混合伪影。

Differentiation of deep venous thrombosis from femoral vein mixing artifact on routine abdominopelvic CT.

作者信息

Doshi Ankur M, Hoffman David, Kierans Andrea S, Ream Justin M, Rosenkrantz Andrew B

机构信息

Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital / Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3191-5. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0525-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to assess the performance of qualitative and quantitative imaging features for the differentiation of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) from mixing artifact on routine portal venous phase abdominopelvic CT.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 40 adult patients with a femoral vein filling defect on portal venous phase CT and a Duplex ultrasound (n = 36) or catheter venogram (n = 4) to confirm presence or absence of DVT. Two radiologists (R1, R2) assessed the femoral veins for various qualitative and quantitative features.

RESULTS

60% of patients were confirmed to have DVT and 40% had mixing artifact. Features with significantly greater frequency in DVT than mixing artifact (all p ≤ 0.006) were central location (R1 90% vs. 28%; R2 96% vs. 31%), sharp margin (R1 83% vs. 28%; R2 96% vs. 31%), venous expansion (R1 48% vs. 6%, R2 56% vs. 6%), and venous wall enhancement (R1 62% vs. 0%; R2 48% vs. 0%). DVT exhibited significantly lower mean attenuation than mixing artifact (R1 42.1 ± 20.2 vs. 57.1 ± 23.6 HU; R2 43.6 ± 19.4 vs. 58.8 ± 23.4 HU, p ≤ 0.031) and a significantly larger difference in vein diameter compared to the contralateral vein (R1 0.4 ± 0.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 cm; R2 0.3 ± 0.4 vs. 0.0 ± 0.1 cm, p ≤ 0.026). At multivariable analysis, central location and sharp margin were significant independent predictors of DVT for both readers (p ≤ 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Awareness of these qualitative and quantitative imaging features may improve radiologists' confidence for differentiating femoral vein DVT and mixing artifact on routine portal venous phase CT. However, given overlap with mixing artifact, larger studies remain warranted.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估在常规门静脉期腹盆腔CT上,定性和定量成像特征在区分深静脉血栓形成(DVT)与混合伪影方面的表现。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了40例在门静脉期CT上出现股静脉充盈缺损的成年患者,并通过双功超声(n = 36)或导管静脉造影(n = 4)来确认是否存在DVT。两名放射科医生(R1、R2)评估股静脉的各种定性和定量特征。

结果

60%的患者被确诊为DVT,40%有混合伪影。在DVT中出现频率显著高于混合伪影的特征(所有p≤0.006)包括中央位置(R1为90%对28%;R2为96%对31%)、边缘清晰(R1为83%对28%;R2为96%对31%)、静脉扩张(R1为48%对6%,R2为56%对6%)以及静脉壁强化(R1为62%对0%;R2为48%对0%)。DVT的平均衰减显著低于混合伪影(R1为42.1±20.2对57.1±23.6 HU;R2为43.6±19.4对58.8±23.4 HU,p≤0.031),并且与对侧静脉相比,静脉直径的差异显著更大(R1为0.4±0.4对0.1±0.2 cm;R2为0.3±0.4对0.0±0.1 cm,p≤0.026)。在多变量分析中,中央位置和边缘清晰是两位阅片者诊断DVT的显著独立预测因素(p≤0.013)。

结论

了解这些定性和定量成像特征可能会提高放射科医生在常规门静脉期CT上区分股静脉DVT和混合伪影的信心。然而,鉴于与混合伪影存在重叠,仍需要开展更大规模的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验