Jao Irene, Kombe Francis, Mwalukore Salim, Bull Susan, Parker Michael, Kamuya Dorcas, Molyneux Sassy, Marsh Vicki
KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Oxford University, UK.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):264-77. doi: 10.1177/1556264615592385.
Increased global sharing of public health research data has potential to advance scientific progress but may present challenges to the interests of research stakeholders, particularly in low-to-middle income countries. Policies for data sharing should be responsive to public views, but there is little evidence of the systematic study of these from low-income countries. This qualitative study explored views on fair data-sharing processes among 60 stakeholders in Kenya with varying research experience, using a deliberative approach. Stakeholders' attitudes were informed by perceptions of benefit and concerns for research data sharing, including risks of stigmatization, loss of privacy, and undermining scientific careers and validity, reported in detail elsewhere. In this article, we discuss institutional trust-building processes seen as central to perceptions of fairness in sharing research data in this setting, including forms of community involvement, individual prior awareness and agreement to data sharing, independence and accountability of governance mechanisms, and operating under a national framework.
全球公共卫生研究数据共享的增加有促进科学进步的潜力,但可能给研究利益相关者的利益带来挑战,尤其是在中低收入国家。数据共享政策应回应公众意见,但几乎没有证据表明对低收入国家的公众意见进行过系统研究。这项定性研究采用协商方法,探讨了肯尼亚60名具有不同研究经验的利益相关者对公平数据共享过程的看法。利益相关者的态度受到对研究数据共享的益处认知和担忧的影响,包括污名化风险、隐私丧失、损害科学事业和有效性等,这些在其他地方有详细报道。在本文中,我们讨论了在这种情况下,被视为研究数据共享公平认知核心的机构信任建设过程,包括社区参与形式、个人对数据共享的事先知晓和同意、治理机制的独立性和问责制,以及在国家框架下运作。