Suppr超能文献

采用 ASGE 研讨会提出的词汇表对胰腺囊性和实性病变进行 EUS 引导下 FNA 的不良事件:一项前瞻性和对照研究。

Adverse events of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cystic and solid lesions by using the lexicon proposed in an ASGE workshop: a prospective and comparative study.

机构信息

Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDM, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Hospital Universitario Araba, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr;83(4):780-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreatic cysts and solid lesions are routinely examined by EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of this procedure by using the lexicon recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE).

METHODS

This was a prospective and comparative study of patients who underwent EUS-FNA in which a 22-gauge needle was used. In the pancreatic cystic lesions group (group I), complete fluid evacuation in a single needle pass was attempted, and ciprofloxacin was given during the procedure and for 3 days after. In the pancreatic solid lesions group (group II), the number of passes was determined by the on-site evaluation of the sample. AEs were defined and graded according to the lexicon recommended by the ASGE. Patients were followed for 48 hours, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were included, 73 in group I and 73 in group II. Potential factors influencing the incidence of AEs (ie, access route for FNA) were similar in both groups. AEs occurred in 5 of 146 patients (3.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3%-8%): 4 in group I (5.5%; 95% CI, 1.7%-13.7%) and 1 in group II (1.4%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 8.1%) (P = .03). Severity was mild in 1 of 5 patients (20%) and moderate in 3 of 5 patients (60%). One patient with a solid mass in the head of the pancreas had a duodenal perforation after EUS and died after surgery. All other AEs occurred in the first 48 hours and resolved with medical therapy. There were 3 incidents of transient hypoxia and self-limited abdominal pain in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. No patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA of pancreatic cysts has an AEs rate similar to that of solid pancreatic masses, which is small enough to consider this procedure a safe and effective method for managing patients with both types of lesions. AEs occurred early after EUS-FNA, and patients should be closely followed during the first 2 days after the procedure.

摘要

背景与目的

超声内镜引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)常用于检查胰腺囊肿和实性病变。本研究旨在通过美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)推荐的词汇表比较该操作不良事件(AE)的发生率。

方法

这是一项前瞻性对比研究,纳入了 146 例接受 22G 针 EUS-FNA 的患者,其中胰腺囊性病变组(I 组)尝试单次进针完全排空囊液,并在操作过程中和操作后 3 天内给予环丙沙星;胰腺实性病变组(II 组)根据现场评估样本的情况确定进针次数。AE 按 ASGE 推荐的词汇表定义和分级。术后 48 小时、1 周和 1 个月对患者进行随访。

结果

共有 146 例患者入组,I 组 73 例,II 组 73 例。两组中影响 AE 发生率的潜在因素(即 FNA 的入路方式)相似。146 例患者中共有 5 例(3.4%;95%置信区间[CI]:1.3%-8%)发生 AE:I 组 4 例(5.5%;95%CI:1.7%-13.7%),II 组 1 例(1.4%;95%CI:-0.5%至 8.1%)(P =.03)。5 例 AE 中,1 例(20%)严重程度为轻度,3 例(60%)为中度。1 例胰头实性肿块患者 EUS 后发生十二指肠穿孔,术后死亡。所有其他 AE 均发生在术后 48 小时内,经药物治疗缓解。1 例和 2 例患者分别出现短暂缺氧和自限性腹痛各 1 次。无患者失访。

结论

EUS-FNA 检查胰腺囊肿的 AE 发生率与胰腺实性肿块相似,小到足以认为该操作是管理两种类型病变患者的一种安全有效的方法。EUS-FNA 后早期出现 AE,术后前 2 天应密切随访患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验