Levy Michael J, Abu Dayyeh Barham K, Fujii Larissa L, Boardman Lisa A, Clain Jonathan E, Iyer Prasad G, Rajan Elizabeth, Topazian Mark D, Wang Kenneth K, Wiersema Maurits J, Gleeson Ferga C
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 May;109(5):676-85. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.479. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
There are virtually no data concerning the risk of adverse events (AEs) following lower gastrointestinal (LGI) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Our aim was to determine the incidence and factors associated with AEs following LGI EUS fine needle aspiration (FNA).
We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary referral center. Five hundred and sixty-three patients underwent LGI EUS FNA between 1 January 2004 and 1 January 2012. We analyzed the 502 patients who had complete follow-up. AE severity was graded (1-5) utilizing Common Terminology Criteria or Visual Analog Scale. AEs were assessed during the procedures, in clinical follow-up, during phone interviews conducted at 7-14 days, and final clinical and/or phone interviews at 2-4 months.
AEs developed in 103 (20.5%) patients and were classified as grade 1, 2, 3, or 4 in 34 (6.8%), 41 (8.2%), 23 (4.6%), and 5 (1.0%) patients, respectively. Bleeding and pain were the commonest AEs. No deaths occurred. On multivariate analysis, AEs were associated with prior pain (odds ratio (OR): 3.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.35-6.25), FNA from a site other than a lymph node (LN) or gut wall (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.10-4.70), and malignant FNA cytology (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.10-2.97); serious (grade 3-4) AEs were associated with prior pain (OR: 15.21, 95% CI: 5.04-45.85) and FNA from a site other than a LN or gut wall (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.15-9.20).
LGI EUS FNA is associated with a high rate of serious grades 3-4 AEs. This may reflect the total number of associated interventions and the frequency of underlying pathology and symptoms.
关于下消化道(LGI)内镜超声(EUS)后不良事件(AE)风险的数据几乎没有。我们的目的是确定LGI EUS细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)后AE的发生率及相关因素。
我们在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。2004年1月1日至2012年1月1日期间,563例患者接受了LGI EUS FNA。我们分析了502例有完整随访资料的患者。使用通用术语标准或视觉模拟量表对AE严重程度进行分级(1 - 5级)。在操作过程中、临床随访期间、7 - 14天进行的电话访谈以及2 - 4个月时的最终临床和/或电话访谈中评估AE。
103例(20.5%)患者发生了AE,分别有34例(6.8%)、41例(8.2%)、23例(4.6%)和5例(1.0%)患者的AE被分类为1级、2级、3级或4级。出血和疼痛是最常见的AE。无死亡发生。多因素分析显示,AE与既往疼痛(比值比(OR):3.83,95%置信区间(CI):2.35 - 6.25)、非淋巴结(LN)或肠壁部位的FNA(OR:2.26,95% CI:1.10 - 4.70)以及恶性FNA细胞学(OR:1.80,95% CI:1.10 - 2.97)相关;严重(3 - 4级)AE与既往疼痛(OR:15.21,95% CI:5.04 - 45.85)和非LN或肠壁部位的FNA(OR:3.25,95% CI:1.15 - 9.20)相关。
LGI EUS FNA与3 - 4级严重AE的高发生率相关。这可能反映了相关干预的总数以及潜在病理和症状的频率。