Suppr超能文献

硬膜外皮质类固醇注射治疗神经根病和椎管狭窄症:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):373-81. doi: 10.7326/M15-0934.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of epidural corticosteroid injections is increasing.

PURPOSE

To review evidence on the benefits and harms of epidural corticosteroid injections in adults with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis of any duration.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE (through May 2015), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, prior systematic reviews, and reference lists.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials of epidural corticosteroid injections versus placebo interventions, or that compared epidural injection techniques, corticosteroids, or doses.

DATA EXTRACTION

Dual extraction and quality assessment of individual studies, which were used to determine the overall strength of evidence (SOE).

DATA SYNTHESIS

30 placebo-controlled trials evaluated epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy, and 8 trials were done for spinal stenosis. For radiculopathy, epidural corticosteroids were associated with greater immediate-term reduction in pain (weighted mean difference on a scale of 0 to 100, -7.55 [95% CI, -11.4 to -3.74]; SOE, moderate), function (standardized mean difference after exclusion of an outlier trial, -0.33 [CI, -0.56 to -0.09]; SOE, low), and short-term surgery risk (relative risk, 0.62 [CI, 0.41 to 0.92]; SOE, low). Effects were below predefined minimum clinically important difference thresholds, and there were no longer-term benefits. Limited evidence showed no clear effects of technical factors, patient characteristics, or comparator interventions on estimates. There were no clear effects of epidural corticosteroid injections for spinal stenosis (SOE, low to moderate). Serious harms were rare, but harms reporting was suboptimal (SOE, low).

LIMITATIONS

The review was restricted to English-language studies. Some meta-analyses were based on small numbers of trials (particularly for spinal stenosis), and most trials had methodological shortcomings.

CONCLUSION

Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy were associated with immediate reductions in pain and function. However, benefits were small and not sustained, and there was no effect on long-term surgery risk. Limited evidence suggested no effectiveness for spinal stenosis.

摘要

背景

硬膜外皮质类固醇注射的应用正在增加。

目的

综述硬膜外皮质类固醇注射治疗各种病程神经根性腰痛或腰椎管狭窄症成人的疗效和安全性。

资料来源

Ovid MEDLINE(截至 2015 年 5 月)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、先前的系统评价以及参考文献列表。

研究选择

随机试验比较了硬膜外皮质类固醇注射与安慰剂干预,或比较了硬膜外注射技术、皮质类固醇或剂量。

资料提取

双人提取和质量评估个体研究,用于确定总体证据强度(SOE)。

资料综合

30 项安慰剂对照试验评估了硬膜外皮质类固醇注射治疗神经根病变,8 项试验评估了腰椎管狭窄症。对于神经根病变,硬膜外皮质类固醇注射可即刻减轻疼痛(0 至 100 分制的加权均数差,-7.55 [95%置信区间,-11.4 至-3.74];SOE,中等)、功能(排除异常试验后的标准化均数差,-0.33 [CI,-0.56 至-0.09];SOE,低)和短期手术风险(相对风险,0.62 [CI,0.41 至 0.92];SOE,低)。疗效低于预先设定的最小临床重要差异阈值,无长期获益。有限的证据表明,技术因素、患者特征或对照干预对评估无明显影响。硬膜外皮质类固醇注射对腰椎管狭窄症无明显疗效(SOE,低至中等)。严重危害罕见,但危害报告欠佳(SOE,低)。

局限性

本综述仅限于英语研究。一些荟萃分析基于小型试验(尤其是腰椎狭窄症),并且大多数试验存在方法学缺陷。

结论

硬膜外皮质类固醇注射治疗神经根病变可即刻减轻疼痛和功能。然而,疗效较小且不持久,对长期手术风险无影响。有限的证据表明对腰椎管狭窄症无效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验