Woodhouse Jim, Putelat Thibaut, McKay Andrew
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 Sep 28;373(2051). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0401.
Structural vibration controlled by interfacial friction is widespread, ranging from friction dampers in gas turbines to the motion of violin strings. To predict, control or prevent such vibration, a constitutive description of frictional interactions is inevitably required. A variety of friction models are discussed to assess their scope and validity, in the light of constraints provided by different experimental observations. Three contrasting case studies are used to illustrate how predicted behaviour can be extremely sensitive to the choice of frictional constitutive model, and to explore possible experimental paths to discriminate between and calibrate dynamic friction models over the full parameter range needed for real applications.
由界面摩擦控制的结构振动十分普遍,从燃气轮机中的摩擦阻尼器到小提琴弦的振动皆是如此。为了预测、控制或防止此类振动,不可避免地需要对摩擦相互作用进行本构描述。根据不同实验观察结果所提供的限制条件,讨论了各种摩擦模型,以评估它们的适用范围和有效性。通过三个对比案例研究来说明预测行为如何对摩擦本构模型的选择极为敏感,并探索在实际应用所需的完整参数范围内区分和校准动态摩擦模型的可能实验途径。