Suppr超能文献

取出无菌导线是首选方法,而不是植入新导线:反对的观点。

Extraction of sterile leads is the preferred approach rather than implanting a new lead: the con perspective.

作者信息

Trucco Emilce, Mont Lluis

机构信息

Arrhythmia Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel, 270, Barcelona 08036, Spain.

Arrhythmia Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel, 270, Barcelona 08036, Spain.

出版信息

Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep;7(3):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

Abstract

Lead malfunction is a common problem in implantable cardiac device patients and is expected to increase with the aging of leads. There is a weak indication for extraction of superfluous leads with the potential for cardiac implantable electronic device interference and abandoned or redundant leads; much remains to be learned from clinical practice. Lead extraction, although safe in experienced hands, remains a high-risk procedure, especially in lower-volume centers and/or when performed by lower-volume operators. Therefore, a strategy of abandoning nonfunctioning leads is reasonable, and lead extractions should be reserved for cases with system infection or high lead burden.

摘要

导线故障是植入式心脏设备患者的常见问题,并且预计会随着导线的老化而增加。对于因可能干扰心脏植入式电子设备而需要取出多余导线以及废弃或冗余导线的情况,有微弱的指征;从临床实践中仍有许多需要了解的地方。导线取出术虽然在经验丰富的医生手中是安全的,但仍然是一项高风险操作,尤其是在手术量较少的中心和/或由手术量较少的操作人员进行时。因此,放弃无功能导线的策略是合理的,导线取出术应仅用于系统感染或导线负担过重的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验