Khoiriyah Umatul, Roberts Chris, Jorm Christine, Van der Vleuten C P M
Medical Education Unit (MEU) Fakultas Kedokteran UII, Jl.Kaliurang Km 14.5 Ngaglik, Sleman, Yogyakarta, 55584, Indonesia.
Sydney Medical School - Northern, the University of Sydney, Hornsby Kur-ring-gai Hospital, Palmerston Road, Hornsby, NSW, 2077, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Aug 26;15:140. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0422-2.
Problem based learning (PBL) is a powerful learning activity but fidelity to intended models may slip and student engagement wane, negatively impacting learning processes, and outcomes. One potential solution to solve this degradation is by encouraging self-assessment in the PBL tutorial. Self-assessment is a central component of the self-regulation of student learning behaviours. There are few measures to investigate self-assessment relevant to PBL processes. We developed a Self-assessment Scale on Active Learning and Critical Thinking (SSACT) to address this gap. We wished to demonstrated evidence of its validity in the context of PBL by exploring its internal structure.
We used a mixed methods approach to scale development. We developed scale items from a qualitative investigation, literature review, and consideration of previous existing tools used for study of the PBL process. Expert review panels evaluated its content; a process of validation subsequently reduced the pool of items. We used structural equation modelling to undertake a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the SSACT and coefficient alpha.
The 14 item SSACT consisted of two domains "active learning" and "critical thinking." The factorial validity of SSACT was evidenced by all items loading significantly on their expected factors, a good model fit for the data, and good stability across two independent samples. Each subscale had good internal reliability (>0.8) and strongly correlated with each other.
The SSACT has sufficient evidence of its validity to support its use in the PBL process to encourage students to self-assess. The implementation of the SSACT may assist students to improve the quality of their learning in achieving PBL goals such as critical thinking and self-directed learning.
基于问题的学习(PBL)是一种强大的学习活动,但对预期模式的忠实度可能会下降,学生的参与度也会减弱,从而对学习过程和结果产生负面影响。解决这种退化的一个潜在解决方案是在PBL教程中鼓励自我评估。自我评估是学生学习行为自我调节的核心组成部分。很少有措施来调查与PBL过程相关的自我评估。我们开发了一个主动学习与批判性思维自我评估量表(SSACT)来填补这一空白。我们希望通过探索其内部结构来证明其在PBL背景下的有效性。
我们采用混合方法进行量表开发。我们从定性调查、文献综述以及对先前用于PBL过程研究的现有工具的考虑中开发量表项目。专家评审小组评估其内容;随后的验证过程减少了项目池。我们使用结构方程模型对SSACT进行验证性因素分析(CFA)和计算α系数。
14项的SSACT由“主动学习”和“批判性思维”两个领域组成。SSACT的因素效度通过所有项目在其预期因素上的显著载荷、数据的良好模型拟合以及两个独立样本的良好稳定性得到证明。每个子量表都具有良好的内部信度(>0.8),并且彼此之间高度相关。
SSACT有足够的效度证据支持其在PBL过程中用于鼓励学生进行自我评估。SSACT的实施可能有助于学生提高学习质量,以实现PBL目标,如批判性思维和自主学习。