Department of Medical Education, Korea University College of Medicine, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Aug;15(3):425-37. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9210-2. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
Evidence supporting Problem-based learning (PBL) fostering students' self-directed learning (SDL) in hybrid PBL curricula is inconsistent. To explore the influence of PBL in a hybrid curriculum on students' SDL, the authors investigated the following: (1) students' self-assessed SDL ability, (2) students' perceptions of the influence of curricular components on SDL, and (3) the relationships between curricular elements and SDL. The research questions were explored both quantitatively and qualitatively. All year 1 (n = 93) and year 2 (n = 93) students in 2004 were invited to participate. Participants completed a 53-item questionnaire addressing (a) self-assessment of their SDL ability, and (b) perceived influence of individual curriculum elements on individual study and SDL. Student and faculty focus group interviews (FGIs) were conducted. Students rated their SDL skills highly, particularly identifying knowledge deficits, learning skills and strategies, and managing study time. Students thought lectures helped in selecting study topics and learning for the tutorial case. Other components including tutors, unit/case objectives, tests, and tutorial discussions, were seen as influencing what to study and the learning process. No significant difference was observed in the responses between year 1 and 2 students. Among the six curriculum components, tutorial discussion and objectives were weakly correlated with with SDL ability. Findings from students and faculty focus group supported the perceived positive influence of the curriculum on SDL. This study found that students' perceived SDL ability was positively influenced by several components of the hybrid PBL curriculum. However, further investigations are needed for a clearer understanding of the specific effects of the hybrid PBL curriculum on students' SDL.
支持基于问题的学习(PBL)培养学生自主学习(SDL)的混合 PBL 课程的证据不一致。为了探讨混合课程中 PBL 对学生 SDL 的影响,作者调查了以下三个方面:(1)学生自我评估的 SDL 能力,(2)学生对课程要素对 SDL 的影响的看法,以及(3)课程要素与 SDL 之间的关系。研究问题同时进行了定量和定性研究。2004 年所有一年级(n=93)和二年级(n=93)学生都被邀请参加。参与者完成了一份 53 项的问卷,内容涉及(a)自我评估他们的 SDL 能力,以及(b)感知个别课程要素对个别学习和 SDL 的影响。学生和教师焦点小组访谈(FGI)也同时进行。学生对他们的 SDL 技能评价很高,特别是识别知识缺陷、学习技能和策略以及管理学习时间。学生认为讲座有助于选择学习主题和为辅导案例学习。其他组件,包括导师、单元/案例目标、测试和辅导讨论,被认为影响学习的内容和学习过程。在一年级和二年级学生的回答中没有观察到显著差异。在六个课程组件中,辅导讨论和目标与 SDL 能力的相关性较弱。学生和教师焦点小组的调查结果支持了课程对 SDL 的积极影响的看法。这项研究发现,混合 PBL 课程的几个组成部分对学生的 SDL 产生了积极的影响。然而,为了更清楚地了解混合 PBL 课程对学生 SDL 的具体影响,还需要进一步的研究。