Suppr超能文献

基础胰岛素治疗方案对非危重症2型糖尿病患者血糖变异性的比较

COMPARISON OF BASAL INSULIN REGIMENS ON GLYCEMIC VARIABILITY IN NONCRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.

作者信息

Haw J Sonya, Farrokhi Farnoosh, Smiley Dawn, Peng Limin, Reyes David, Newton Christopher, Pasquel Francisco J, Vellanki Priyathama, Umpierrez Guillermo E

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2015 Dec;21(12):1333-43. doi: 10.4158/EP14540.OR. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of different subcutaneous basal insulin regimens on glycemic variability (GV) and hospital complications in non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This study is a post hoc analysis of 279 general medicine and surgery patients treated with either a "Basal Bolus" insulin regimen using glargine once daily and glulisine before meals or a "Basal Plus" regimen using glargine once daily plus correction doses of glulisine before meals for glucose >140 mg/dL. GV was calculated as mean delta (Δ) daily glucose, mean SD, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE).

RESULTS

Treatment with Basal Bolus and Basal Plus regimens resulted in similar mean daily glucose, hypoglycemia, length of stay (LOS), and hospital complications (all P>.05). There were no differences in GV between treatment groups by Δ change (72.5 ± 36 vs. 69.3 ± 34 mg/dL), SD (38.5 ± 18 vs. 37.1 ± 16 mg/dL) and MAGE (67.5 ± 34 vs. 66.1 ± 39 mg/dL) (all P>.05). Surgery patients treated with Basal Bolus had higher GV compared to those treated with Basal Plus (Δ daily glucose and SD: P = .02, MAGE: P = .009), but no difference in GV was found between treatment groups for the general medicine patients (P>.05). Patients with hypoglycemia events had higher GV compared to subjects without hypoglycemia (P<.05), but no association was found between GV and hospital complications (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

Treating hospitalized, non-ICU, diabetic patients with Basal Plus insulin regimen resulted in similar glucose control and GV compared to the standard Basal Bolus insulin regimen. Higher GV was not associated with hospital complications.

摘要

目的

评估不同皮下基础胰岛素治疗方案对非重症监护病房(ICU)2型糖尿病(T2D)患者血糖变异性(GV)及医院并发症的影响。

方法

本研究是一项事后分析,纳入了279例普通内科和外科患者,这些患者接受了两种胰岛素治疗方案之一:一种是“基础-餐时”胰岛素方案,即每日一次甘精胰岛素联合餐时门冬胰岛素;另一种是“基础加餐时”方案,即每日一次甘精胰岛素联合血糖>140 mg/dL时餐时门冬胰岛素的校正剂量。GV通过每日平均血糖变化量(Δ)、平均标准差(SD)和血糖波动幅度平均值(MAGE)来计算。

结果

“基础-餐时”和“基础加餐时”方案治疗后的平均每日血糖、低血糖发生率、住院时间(LOS)及医院并发症发生率相似(均P>.05)。治疗组间GV在Δ变化(72.5±36 vs. 69.3±34 mg/dL)、SD(38.5±18 vs. 37.1±16 mg/dL)和MAGE(67.5±34 vs. 66.1±39 mg/dL)方面均无差异(均P>.05)。接受“基础-餐时”治疗的外科患者GV高于接受“基础加餐时”治疗的患者(每日血糖变化量和SD:P =.02,MAGE:P =.009),但在内科患者中,治疗组间GV无差异(P>.05)。发生低血糖事件的患者GV高于未发生低血糖的患者(P<.05),但未发现GV与医院并发症之间存在关联(P>.05)。

结论

与标准的“基础-餐时”胰岛素方案相比,采用“基础加餐时”胰岛素方案治疗住院的非ICU糖尿病患者,血糖控制和GV相似。较高的GV与医院并发症无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验