Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病内科和外科住院患者的血糖控制差异及皮下胰岛素治疗反应。

Differences in inpatient glycemic control and response to subcutaneous insulin therapy between medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(6):637-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in inpatient glycemic control and response to two different glargine-based insulin regimens in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 298 non-ICU medicine and surgery patients with T2D treated with Basal Bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals and with Basal Plus regimen with glargine once daily and supplemental doses of glulisine before meals for blood glucose (BG)>140mg/dl. Major study outcomes included differences in mean daily BG, frequency of treatment failures (defined as >2 consecutive BG>240mg/dl or a mean daily BG>240mg/dl), and hypoglycemia between the medicine and surgery cohorts.

RESULTS

Patients treated with Basal Bolus or with Basal Plus experienced similar improvement in mean daily BG after 1st day of therapy (p=0.16), number of treatment failures (p=0.11) and hypoglycemic events (p=0.50). Compared to surgery patients (n=130), medicine patients (n=168) had higher admission BG (p=0.01) and HbA1c levels (p<0.01); however, they had similar response to either treatment regimen without differences in mean daily BG after 1st day of therapy (p=0.18), number of treatment failures (p=0.58), daily insulin requirements (p=0.36), or in the frequency of hypoglycemia (p=0.79).

CONCLUSION

The Basal Plus regimen with glargine once daily and correction doses with glulisine before meals resulted in similar glycemic control to basal bolus regimen. We observed no differences in response to either basal insulin regimen between medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

比较普通内科和外科 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者应用两种不同甘精胰岛素方案的住院血糖控制和达标率差异。

方法

这是一项对前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验的事后分析,共纳入 298 例非 ICU 内科和外科 T2D 患者,给予甘精胰岛素基础-餐时胰岛素方案(每日 1 次甘精胰岛素+餐时门冬胰岛素)或甘精胰岛素基础-追加胰岛素方案(每日 1 次甘精胰岛素+餐时门冬胰岛素追加)治疗,当血糖(BG)>140mg/dl 时给予追加门冬胰岛素。主要研究结局包括两组患者平均每日 BG 差异、治疗失败(连续 2 次 BG>240mg/dl 或平均每日 BG>240mg/dl)和低血糖发生率差异。

结果

起始治疗第 1 天,两组患者平均每日 BG 改善情况相似(p=0.16),治疗失败(p=0.11)和低血糖事件(p=0.50)发生率也相似。与外科患者(n=130)相比,内科患者(n=168)入院时 BG(p=0.01)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平(p<0.01)更高;但两组患者对两种治疗方案的反应相似,治疗第 1 天平均每日 BG(p=0.18)、治疗失败(p=0.58)、每日胰岛素需要量(p=0.36)和低血糖发生率(p=0.79)差异均无统计学意义。

结论

每日 1 次甘精胰岛素联合餐时门冬胰岛素的基础-追加胰岛素方案与基础-餐时胰岛素方案相比,可使血糖得到相似控制。我们观察到,内科和外科 T2D 患者对这两种基础胰岛素方案的反应无差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Insulin therapy for the management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients.胰岛素治疗用于住院患者高血糖的管理。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;41(1):175-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
6
Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients.住院患者高血糖管理。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Nov;1212:1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05805.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验