Simons Pascale A M, Benders Jos, Marneffe Wim, Pijls-Johannesma Madelon, Vandijck Dominique
Patient Safety Research Group, Faculty of Business Economics, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(1):64-74. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2014-0007.
For change programs to succeed, it is vital to have a detailed understanding of employees' views regarding the program, especially when the proposed changes are potentially contested. Gaining insight into employee perceptions helps managers to decide how to proceed. The authors conducted two workshops in a radiotherapy institute to assess the benefits and drawbacks, as well as their underlying causes, of a proposed Lean change program. Managers' views on the workshops' usefulness were charted. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Two workshops were organized in which employees predicted positive and negative effects of a Lean program. The workshops combined a structured brainstorm (KJ-technique) and an evaluation of the expected effects. Eight top managers judged the workshops' value on supporting decision making.
In total, 15 employees participated in the workshops. Participants from workshop 2 reported more expected effects (27 effects; 18 positive) than from workshop 1 (14 effects; six positive). However, when effects were categorized, similar results were shown. Three from eight managers scored the results relevant for decision making and four neutral. Seven managers recommended future use of the instrument. Increased employee involvement and bottom-up thinking combined with relatively low costs were appreciated most.
The workshop could serve as a simple instrument to improve decision making and enhance successful implementation of change programs, as it was expected to enhance employees' involvement and was relatively easy to conduct and cheap.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The workshop increased insight into employee views, facilitating adaptive actions by healthcare organization managers.
为使变革计划取得成功,详细了解员工对该计划的看法至关重要,尤其是当提议的变革可能存在争议时。深入了解员工的看法有助于管理者决定如何推进。作者在一家放射治疗机构举办了两次研讨会,以评估一项提议的精益变革计划的利弊及其潜在原因。记录了管理者对研讨会实用性的看法。本文旨在讨论这些问题。
设计/方法/途径:组织了两次研讨会,让员工预测精益计划的积极和消极影响。研讨会结合了结构化头脑风暴(KJ 法)和对预期效果的评估。八位高层管理者对研讨会在支持决策方面的价值进行了评判。
共有 15 名员工参加了研讨会。与研讨会 1(14 个影响;6 个积极影响)相比,研讨会 2 的参与者报告了更多的预期影响(27 个影响;18 个积极影响)。然而,当对影响进行分类时,结果相似。八位管理者中有三位认为结果与决策相关,四位持中立态度。七位管理者建议未来使用该工具。员工参与度的提高和自下而上的思维方式以及相对较低的成本最受赞赏。
该研讨会可作为一种简单工具,用于改善决策并增强变革计划的成功实施,因为它有望提高员工的参与度,且相对易于开展且成本低廉。
原创性/价值:该研讨会增加了对员工观点的了解,有助于医疗保健组织管理者采取适应性行动。