Coronado Fátima, Chen Guan M, Smith C Kay, Glynn M Kathleen
Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;22(4):403-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000326.
A highly skilled public health workforce is needed for responding to health threats, and that workforce must be able to communicate its scientific findings effectively.
We evaluated the scientific communication effectiveness of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) field-based Epidemic Intelligence Service officers (EISOs).
A descriptive analysis of all scientific information products produced and submitted for institutional clearance by CDC's field-based EISOs during 2009-2014.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of abstracts, journal manuscripts, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports (MMWRs), and other information products approved by CDC during 2009-2014; the number of those products published; and of those published, the number cited in the scientific literature.
During 2009-2014, a total of 152 field-based EISOs produced 835 scientific information products, including 437 abstracts, 261 manuscripts, and 103 MMWRs. The majority of scientific information products submitted for clearance were abstracts (52.3%), and infectious diseases (75.3%) constituted the majority of topics. Among the 103 MMWRs and 261 manuscripts cleared, 88 (85%) and 199 (76%) were published, respectively, with the majority also infectious disease-related. The 199 published manuscripts were cited in the scientific literature 2415 times, and the 88 published MMWRs were cited 1249 times. Field-based EISOs published their work in 74 different peer-reviewed medical and public health journals, with 54% published in journals with impact factors of 1 to 5.
Field-based EISOs' publications are a measurable marker that reflects proficiency in epidemiology, written communication, and professionalism, and those publications are a direct reflection of EISOs' contribution to local and state health departments. Our study establishes a baseline for future evaluations of publication outcome of scientific information products by EISOs. Information released by EISOs provides health professionals with the scientific knowledge necessary for improving their practice and helps CDC achieve a broader societal, environmental, cultural, and economic impact.
应对健康威胁需要一支技术精湛的公共卫生工作队伍,且该队伍必须能够有效地传达其科学发现。
我们评估了疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)实地派驻的疫情情报服务官员(EISO)的科学传播效果。
对2009年至2014年期间CDC实地派驻的EISO制作并提交机构审批的所有科学信息产品进行描述性分析。
2009年至2014年期间CDC批准的摘要、期刊论文、《发病率与死亡率周报》(MMWR)及其他信息产品的数量;已发表的此类产品数量;以及已发表产品中被科学文献引用的数量。
2009年至2014年期间,共有152名实地派驻的EISO制作了835份科学信息产品,包括437篇摘要、261篇论文和103份MMWR。提交审批的科学信息产品中,大部分是摘要(52.3%),且传染病(75.3%)是主要主题。在获批的103份MMWR和261篇论文中,分别有88份(85%)和199篇(76%)发表,其中大部分也与传染病相关。199篇已发表论文在科学文献中被引用2415次,88份已发表的MMWR被引用1249次。实地派驻的EISO将其工作发表在74种不同的同行评审医学和公共卫生期刊上,其中54%发表在影响因子为1至5的期刊上。
实地派驻的EISO的出版物是反映流行病学水平、书面沟通能力和专业素养的可衡量指标,这些出版物直接体现了EISO对地方和州卫生部门的贡献。我们的研究为未来评估EISO科学信息产品的发表成果建立了基线。EISO发布的信息为卫生专业人员提供了改善其实践所需的科学知识,并有助于CDC实现更广泛的社会、环境、文化和经济影响。