Hrudey Steve E, Backer Lorraine C, Humpage Andrew R, Krasner Stuart W, Michaud Dominique S, Moore Lee E, Singer Philip C, Stanford Benjamin D
a Environmental and Analytical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry , University of Alberta , Edmonton , Alberta , Canada.
b Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2015;18(5):213-41. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2015.1067661. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
Exposure to chlorination disinfection by-products (CxDBPs) is prevalent in populations using chlorination-based methods to disinfect public water supplies. Multifaceted research has been directed for decades to identify, characterize, and understand the toxicology of these compounds, control and minimize their formation, and conduct epidemiologic studies related to exposure. Urinary bladder cancer has been the health risk most consistently associated with CxDBPs in epidemiologic studies. An international workshop was held to (1) discuss the qualitative strengths and limitations that inform the association between bladder cancer and CxDBPs in the context of possible causation, (2) identify knowledge gaps for this topic in relation to chlorine/chloramine-based disinfection practice(s) in the United States, and (3) assess the evidence for informing risk management. Epidemiological evidence linking exposures to CxDBPs in drinking water to human bladder cancer risk provides insight into causality. However, because of imprecise, inaccurate, or incomplete estimation of CxDBPs levels in epidemiologic studies, translation from hazard identification directly to risk management and regulatory policy for CxDBPs can be challenging. Quantitative risk estimates derived from toxicological risk assessment for CxDBPs currently cannot be reconciled with those from epidemiologic studies, notwithstanding the complexities involved, making regulatory interpretation difficult. Evidence presented here has both strengths and limitations that require additional studies to resolve and improve the understanding of exposure response relationships. Replication of epidemiologic findings in independent populations with further elaboration of exposure assessment is needed to strengthen the knowledge base needed to better inform effective regulatory approaches.
在使用基于氯化的方法对公共供水进行消毒的人群中,接触氯化消毒副产物(CxDBPs)的情况很普遍。几十年来,人们开展了多方面的研究,以识别、表征和了解这些化合物的毒理学,控制并尽量减少它们的形成,并开展与接触相关的流行病学研究。在流行病学研究中,膀胱癌一直是与CxDBPs最常相关的健康风险。举办了一次国际研讨会,目的是:(1)在可能的因果关系背景下,讨论支持膀胱癌与CxDBPs之间关联的定性优势和局限性;(2)确定在美国基于氯/氯胺的消毒实践中,该主题的知识空白;(3)评估为风险管理提供信息的证据。将饮用水中接触CxDBPs与人类膀胱癌风险联系起来的流行病学证据为因果关系提供了见解。然而,由于流行病学研究中对CxDBPs水平的估计不准确、不精确或不完整,从危害识别直接转化为CxDBPs的风险管理和监管政策可能具有挑战性。尽管涉及诸多复杂性,但目前从CxDBPs毒理学风险评估得出的定量风险估计与流行病学研究得出的估计无法协调一致,这使得监管解释变得困难。此处呈现的证据既有优势也有局限性,需要进一步研究来解决并增进对接触反应关系的理解。需要在独立人群中重复流行病学研究结果,并进一步详细阐述接触评估,以加强所需的知识库,从而更好地为有效的监管方法提供信息。