• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科肿瘤学会和美国放射肿瘤学会共识指南对1期和2期浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术切缘的影响

Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Chung A, Gangi A, Amersi F, Bose S, Zhang X, Giuliano A

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S422-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4829-0. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4829-0
PMID:26310280
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact that the release of consensus guidelines for margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) had on re-excision rates.

METHODS

A retrospective review examined a prospectively maintained database of patients who had operable invasive breast cancer treated with BCS at the authors' institution. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) those with a diagnosis determined from 1 July 2011 to 31 July 2013 (before release of the guidelines) and (2) those with a diagnosis determined from 1 February 2014 to 31 July 2014 (after release of the guidelines). The groups were evaluated with respect to patient and tumor characteristics, re-excision rates, and reasons for re-excision.

RESULTS

A total of 846 cases of BCS were managed: 597 in group 1 and 249 in group 2. Re-excision rates were significantly reduced after release of the consensus guidelines (p = 0.03). Re-excisions were performed for 115 (19 %) of 597 patients in group 1 and 32 (13 %) of 249 patients in group 2. After release of the guidelines, re-excisions were performed for positive margins, as defined by the consensus statement, in 25 (78 %) of 32 cases. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, tumor size, grade, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Group 1 had more tumors of mixed ductal and lobular histology than group 2, and group 2 had more lobular tumors than group 1 (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus guidelines on margins for BCS were applied for 78 % of the patients who underwent re-excision and resulted in a significant reduction in re-excision rates.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估保乳手术(BCS)切缘共识指南的发布对再次切除率的影响。

方法

一项回顾性研究对作者所在机构接受BCS治疗的可手术浸润性乳腺癌患者的前瞻性维护数据库进行了检查。患者分为两组:(1)诊断时间为2011年7月1日至2013年7月31日(指南发布前)的患者;(2)诊断时间为2014年2月1日至2014年7月31日(指南发布后)的患者。对两组患者的患者和肿瘤特征、再次切除率及再次切除原因进行了评估。

结果

共处理了846例BCS病例:第1组597例,第2组249例。共识指南发布后,再次切除率显著降低(p = 0.03)。第1组597例患者中有115例(19%)进行了再次切除,第2组249例患者中有32例(13%)进行了再次切除。指南发布后,按照共识声明定义,32例中有25例(78%)因切缘阳性进行了再次切除。两组在年龄、肿瘤大小、分级、淋巴结状态、雌激素受体状态、孕激素受体状态或人表皮生长因子受体2状态方面无显著差异。第1组混合导管和小叶组织学类型的肿瘤比第2组多,第2组小叶肿瘤比第1组多(p = 0.02)。

结论

BCS切缘共识指南应用于78%接受再次切除的患者,使再次切除率显著降低。

相似文献

1
Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.外科肿瘤学会和美国放射肿瘤学会共识指南对1期和2期浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术切缘的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S422-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4829-0. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
2
Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.新的保乳手术切缘指南对保乳手术的影响:再次切除率及残余肿瘤预测率的变化
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):729-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.保乳手术中术中切缘管理技术的比较:标准化方法可降低残留疾病的可能性,且不增加手术时间。
Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):262-8. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0473-3. Epub 2013 May 7.
4
Predictors of Residual Tumor in Breast-Conserving Therapy.保乳治疗中残留肿瘤的预测因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S451-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4736-4. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
5
Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.肿瘤整形保乳手术可降低乳房切除术和术后再次切除率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3363-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4738-2. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
6
Reexcision for positive margins in breast cancer: A predictive score of residual disease.乳腺癌切缘阳性的再次切除:残余疾病的预测评分
Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;24(3):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
7
Surgical management of lobular carcinoma from a national screening program: a retrospective analysis.从国家筛查计划看小叶性乳腺癌的外科治疗:回顾性分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
8
Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后再次切除标本中残留疾病的预测因素。
Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01249.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
9
Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?乳腺钼靶密度对保乳手术后切缘再次切除率有影响吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):782-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4917-1. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
10
Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术患者中,再次切除对切缘阳性及切缘接近阳性的作用。
Breast. 2014 Dec;23(6):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective.浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术后的再次切除术率:艾伯塔省的观点。
Can J Surg. 2024 Nov 6;67(6):E363-E369. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004723. Print 2024 Nov-Dec.
2
Intraoperative fluorescence imaging with aminolevulinic acid detects grossly occult breast cancer: a phase II randomized controlled trial.术中荧光成像联合氨基酮戊酸检测隐匿性乳腺癌:一项 II 期随机对照试验。
Breast Cancer Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01442-7.
3
Reoperation rate after breast conserving surgery as quality indicator in breast cancer treatment: A reappraisal.
保乳手术后的再次手术率作为乳腺癌治疗的质量指标:再评价。
Breast. 2020 Oct;53:181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery?采用美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)导管原位癌切缘指南:对额外手术使用情况有何影响?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):295-302. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08610-7. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
5
Deimplementation of the Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.取消低价值乳腺癌手术的选择明智建议的实施:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 1;155(8):759-770. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0322.
6
Evaluation of 2014 margin guidelines on re-excision and recurrence rates after breast conserving surgery: A multi-institution retrospective study.2014 年切缘指南对保乳手术后再次切除和复发率的评估:一项多机构回顾性研究。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
7
Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines?保乳术后切缘阳性的局部复发率:乳腺外科医生协会-美国放射肿瘤学会切缘指南发表后是否降低?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3856-3862. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07751-8. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Positive margins (R1) risk factors in breast cancer conservative surgery.乳腺癌保乳手术切缘阳性(R1)的危险因素。
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2019 Jul 26;11:243-248. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S210788. eCollection 2019.
9
Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.保乳手术治疗癌症后再次手术的相关因素:美国乳腺外科学会成员的前瞻性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3321-3336. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07547-w. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.美国乳腺外科医师学会工具包的更新,以应对保乳手术再次手术流行的问题。
Gland Surg. 2018 Dec;7(6):536-553. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.11.03.