Maruyama N, Nakagawa T, Ito K, Cabanos C, Borres M P, Movérare R, Tanaka A, Sato S, Ebisawa M
Laboratory of Food Quality Design and Development, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Allergy, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Jan;46(1):163-71. doi: 10.1111/cea.12626.
The number of reported cases of allergic reactions to sesame seeds (Sesamum indicum) has increased significantly. The specific IgE tests and skin prick tests presently available for diagnosis of sesame allergy are all based on crude sesame extract and are limited by their low clinical specificity. Thus, oral food challenge (OFC) is still the gold standard in the diagnosis.
The aim was to identify the allergen components useful to diagnose sesame-allergic children with the goal to reduce the number of OFCs needed.
Ninety-two sesame-sensitized children were consecutively enrolled and diagnosed based on OFC or convincing history. Specific IgE to purified native 11S globulin (nSes i 11S), 7S globulin (nSes i 7S), 2S albumin (nSes i 2S), and two recombinant 2S albumins (rSes i 1 and rSes i 2) was measured by ELISA and/or ImmunoCAP (rSes i 1/streptavidin application).
Based on area under curve (AUC) values from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, rSes i 1 was shown to have the best diagnostic performance of the allergen components in ELISA. The experimental rSes i 1 ImmunoCAP test had larger AUC (0.891; 95% CI, 0.826-0.955) compared to the commercially available sesame ImmunoCAP (0.697; 95% CI, 0.589-0.805). The clinical sensitivity and specificity for the rSes i 1 ImmunoCAP test at optimal cut-off (3.96 kUA /L) were 86.1% and 85.7%, respectively.
Sensitization to Ses i 1 is strongly associated with clinical sesame allergy. Measurement of specific IgE to rSes i 1 could reduce the numbers of OFCs needed.
芝麻(Sesamum indicum)过敏反应的报告病例数显著增加。目前用于诊断芝麻过敏的特异性IgE检测和皮肤点刺试验均基于粗制芝麻提取物,且临床特异性较低。因此,口服食物激发试验(OFC)仍是诊断的金标准。
旨在确定有助于诊断芝麻过敏儿童的过敏原成分,以减少所需的OFC次数。
连续纳入92名对芝麻过敏的儿童,并根据OFC或确凿病史进行诊断。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和/或免疫化学发光法(ImmunoCAP)(应用rSes i 1/链霉亲和素)检测对纯化的天然11S球蛋白(nSes i 11S)、7S球蛋白(nSes i 7S)、2S白蛋白(nSes i 2S)和两种重组2S白蛋白(rSes i 1和rSes i 2)的特异性IgE。
根据受试者工作特征(ROC)分析的曲线下面积(AUC)值,rSes i 1在ELISA中显示出最佳的过敏原成分诊断性能。与市售芝麻免疫化学发光法(AUC为0.697;95%可信区间,0.589-0.805)相比,实验性rSes i 1免疫化学发光法检测的AUC更大(0.891;95%可信区间,0.826-0.955)。rSes i 1免疫化学发光法检测在最佳临界值(3.96 kUA /L)时的临床敏感性和特异性分别为86.1%和85.7%。
对Ses i 1致敏与临床芝麻过敏密切相关。检测rSes i 1的特异性IgE可减少所需的OFC次数。