• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物医学信息和童年经历对量刑的影响。

The Influence of Biomedical Information and Childhood History on Sentencing.

机构信息

Coastal Carolina University.

Chungbuk National University.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2015 Nov-Dec;33(6):815-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2199. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.2199
PMID:26311175
Abstract

A recent trend in court is for defense attorneys to introduce brain scans and other forms of biomedical information (BI) into criminal trials as mitigating evidence. The present study investigates how BI, when considered in combination with a defendant's childhood information (CI), can influence the length of a defendant's sentence. We hypothesized that certain combinations of BI and CI result in shorter sentences because they suggest that the defendant poses less of a threat to society. Participants were asked to read accounts of the trial of a murder suspect and, based on the information therein, recommend a sentence as if they were the judge. The defendant was diagnosed with psychopathy, but biomedical information regarding that diagnosis was included or excluded depending on the BI condition. The defendant was further described as growing up in either a loving or abusive family. The results showed that, if BI was present in the trial account, the defendant from an abusive family was perceived as less of a threat to society and received a shorter recommended sentence than if the defendant had been from a loving family. If BI was absent from the account, the pattern was reversed: the defendant from a loving family was perceived as less of a threat to society and received a shorter recommended sentence than if he had been from an abusive family. Implications for the use of BI and CI in court trials are discussed, as well as their relationship to free will and the function of punishment as retribution and utility.

摘要

近年来,辩方律师在刑事审判中引入大脑扫描和其他形式的生物医学信息(BI)作为减轻处罚的证据,这一趋势愈演愈烈。本研究旨在探讨 BI 与被告童年信息(CI)结合使用时如何影响被告的刑期。我们假设某些 BI 和 CI 的组合会导致刑期缩短,因为它们表明被告对社会的威胁较小。参与者被要求阅读谋杀案嫌疑人审判的记录,并根据其中的信息,就好像他们是法官一样建议刑期。被告被诊断患有精神变态,但关于该诊断的生物医学信息是否包含取决于 BI 条件。被告进一步被描述为在充满爱意或虐待的家庭中长大。结果表明,如果 BI 在审判记录中存在,那么来自虐待家庭的被告被认为对社会的威胁较小,建议的刑期比来自充满爱意的家庭的被告更短。如果记录中没有 BI,则会出现相反的模式:来自充满爱意家庭的被告被认为对社会的威胁较小,建议的刑期比来自虐待家庭的被告更短。本文讨论了 BI 和 CI 在法庭审判中的应用及其与自由意志的关系,以及惩罚作为报应和效用的功能。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Biomedical Information and Childhood History on Sentencing.生物医学信息和童年经历对量刑的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2015 Nov-Dec;33(6):815-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2199. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
2
The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.《刑法案件中修正版心理变态检查表的效果:模拟陪审员对心理变态标签的反应》
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):878-91. doi: 10.1002/bsl.958. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
3
Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.在死刑量刑中,当面对被告有虐待或忽视儿童历史的情况时陪审员的决策。
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Nov;34(6):742-766. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2271. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
4
Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.天性、教养与死刑:基因 - 环境相互作用、未来危险性及深思熟虑的证据如何影响量刑决策。
Behav Sci Law. 2018 Jan;36(1):65-83. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2306. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
5
Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.刑事被告童年性虐待史及人格障碍诊断对陪审员决策的影响。
Personal Ment Health. 2014 Aug;8(3):188-98. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1260. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
6
Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior.行为遗传学证据对犯罪行为裁决的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(1):91-100.
7
No sympathy for the devil: attributing psychopathic traits to capital murderers also predicts support for executing them.对魔鬼没有同情心:将精神病态特征归因于死刑犯也预示着对处决他们的支持。
Personal Disord. 2013 Apr;4(2):175-81. doi: 10.1037/a0026442. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
8
A Proposed Model for Assessing Defendant Competence to Self-Represent.一种评估被告自我辩护能力的提议模型。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2016 Dec;44(4):425-436.
9
Issues pertaining to expert evidence and the reasoning about punishment in a neuroscience-based sentencing appeal.与基于神经科学的量刑上诉中专家证据和关于处罚的推理有关的问题。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jul-Aug;65:101409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
10
Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.任意性与死刑:审判期间被告的形象如何影响死刑陪审员的量刑决定。
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(2):215-34. doi: 10.1002/bsl.673.