Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 185 Pilgrim Road, Baker 4, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 185 Pilgrim Road, Baker 4, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):521-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv215. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
To determine the incidence and risk factors for development of symptomatic heart failure (HF) following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter.
We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation between November 2013 and June 2014. Post-discharge symptoms were assessed via telephone follow-up and clinic visits. The primary outcome was symptomatic HF requiring treatment with new/increased diuretic dosing. Secondary outcomes were prolonged index hospitalization and readmission for HF ≤30 days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between patient/procedural characteristic and post-ablation HF. Among 111 PVI patients [median age 62.0 years; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 55%], 29 patients (26.1%) developed symptomatic HF, 6 patients (5.4%) required prolonged index hospitalization, and 8 patients (7.2%) were readmitted for HF. In univariate analyses, persistent AF [odds ratio (OR) 2.97, P = 0.02], AF at start of the procedure (OR 2.99, P = 0.01), additional ablation lines (OR 11.07, P < 0.0001), and final left atrial pressure (OR 1.10 per 1 mmHg increase, P = 0.02) were associated with HF development. Peri-procedural diuresis, net fluid balance, and LVEF were not correlated. In multivariable analyses, only additional ablation lines (ORadj 9.17, P = 0.007) were independently associated with post-ablation HF. Six patients (16.7%) developed HF after CTI ablation.
A 26.1% of patients undergoing PVI and 16.7% of patients undergoing CTI ablation developed symptomatic HF when prospectively and uniformly assessed. 12.6% of patients experienced prolonged index hospitalizations or readmission for management of HF within 1 week after PVI. Improved understanding of risk factors for post-ablation HF may be critical in developing strategies to address during AF ablation.
确定心房颤动(房颤)和心房扑动导管消融后出现有症状心力衰竭(HF)的发生率和危险因素。
我们前瞻性纳入了 2013 年 11 月至 2014 年 6 月间接受肺静脉隔离(PVI)或腔静脉峡部(CTI)消融的连续患者。通过电话随访和门诊就诊评估出院后症状。主要结局是需要新的/增加利尿剂剂量治疗的有症状 HF。次要结局是延长索引住院时间和 HF 30 天内再入院。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归评估患者/手术特征与消融后 HF 之间的关系。在 111 例 PVI 患者中(中位年龄 62.0 岁;左心室射血分数[LVEF]55%),29 例(26.1%)患者出现有症状 HF,6 例(5.4%)需要延长索引住院时间,8 例(7.2%)因 HF 再次入院。单变量分析中,持续性房颤[比值比(OR)2.97,P = 0.02]、手术开始时房颤(OR 2.99,P = 0.01)、附加消融线(OR 11.07,P <0.0001)和最终左心房压(OR 每增加 1mmHg 增加 1.10,P = 0.02)与 HF 发展相关。围手术期利尿剂使用、净液体平衡和 LVEF 与 HF 无关。多变量分析中,仅附加消融线(ORadj 9.17,P = 0.007)与消融后 HF 独立相关。6 例(16.7%)患者在行 CTI 消融后出现 HF。
前瞻性和统一评估时,111 例行 PVI 和 6 例行 CTI 消融的患者中分别有 26.1%和 16.7%的患者出现有症状 HF。12.6%的患者在行 PVI 后 1 周内出现延长索引住院时间或因 HF 再入院治疗。深入了解消融后 HF 的危险因素可能对于制定房颤消融期间的策略至关重要。