Jakobsen Jakob Kristian
a Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Urol. 2015 Dec;49(6):427-432. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1076032. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
Few urologists deal with penile cancer on a daily basis. Owing to the rarity of the disease and its diversity in presentation, clinical experience accumulates slowly and new paradigms spread sporadically. This review provides a concise update on the background, clinical features and multidisciplinary management strategies of penile cancer. The evidence base of penile cancer management recommendations is devoid of randomized controlled trials and relies mainly on retrospective cohort studies from single institutions. In recent years, international multicentre collaboration has increased the quality of evidence. Larger study cohorts allow researchers to engage in subgroup analysis of patients with poor prognosis, of which the literature so far has been scarce. Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines are available through the European Association of Urology. This review highlights the importance of early and minimally invasive regional lymph-node staging of all patients of stage T1G2 or higher, and underlines the therapeutic potential of inguinal lymph-node dissection in lymph-node positive patients. A discussion of the oncological safety of current trends towards more phallus-sparing treatment techniques emphasizes the importance of proper case selection, thorough patient information, consequent follow-up and the possibility of a reconstructive procedure after organ-sparing ablative penile surgery. The aetiological role of human papilloma virus (HPV) is touched upon and the evidence for circumcision and HPV vaccination of boys is briefly weighed. The value of multidisciplinary treatment of advanced penile cancer is underlined and the role of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy is discussed. Finally, the perspectives for hybrid tracer sentinel node, robot-assisted lymph-node surgery and targeted therapies are addressed.
很少有泌尿外科医生每天都处理阴茎癌病例。由于该疾病罕见且表现多样,临床经验积累缓慢,新的治疗模式也只是零星传播。本综述对阴茎癌的背景、临床特征及多学科管理策略进行了简要更新。阴茎癌管理建议的证据基础缺乏随机对照试验,主要依赖于单机构的回顾性队列研究。近年来,国际多中心合作提高了证据质量。更大的研究队列使研究人员能够对预后不良的患者进行亚组分析,而迄今为止这方面的文献较少。欧洲泌尿外科协会提供了全面的循证指南。本综述强调了对所有T1G2期或更高分期患者进行早期和微创区域淋巴结分期的重要性,并强调了腹股沟淋巴结清扫术对淋巴结阳性患者的治疗潜力。对当前更倾向于保留阴茎治疗技术趋势的肿瘤学安全性的讨论,强调了正确的病例选择、充分的患者信息告知、后续的随访以及保留器官的阴茎切除术后重建手术可能性的重要性。文中还提及了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的病因学作用,并简要权衡了男孩包皮环切术和HPV疫苗接种的证据。强调了晚期阴茎癌多学科治疗的价值,并讨论了化疗、放疗和放化疗的作用。最后,探讨了混合示踪剂前哨淋巴结、机器人辅助淋巴结手术和靶向治疗的前景。