Suppr超能文献

艾替班特再次注射相关特征分析:艾替班特疗效调查结果

Analysis of characteristics associated with reinjection of icatibant: Results from the icatibant outcome survey.

作者信息

Longhurst Hilary J, Aberer Werner, Bouillet Laurence, Caballero Teresa, Fabien Vincent, Zanichelli Andrea, Maurer Marcus

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):399-406. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3892.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Phase 3 icatibant trials showed that most hereditary angioedema (HAE) (C1 inhibitor deficiency) acute attacks were treated successfully with one injection of icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist. We conducted a post hoc analysis of icatibant reinjection for HAE type I and II attacks in a real-world setting by using data from the Icatibant Outcome Survey, an ongoing observational study that monitors the safety and effectiveness of icatibant treatment.

METHODS

Descriptive retrospective analyses of icatibant reinjection were performed on Icatibant Outcome Survey data (February 2008 to December 2012). New attacks were defined as the onset of new symptoms after full resolution of the previous attack. Potential associations between the patient and attack characteristics and reinjection were explored by using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Icatibant was administered for 652 attacks in 170 patients with HAE type I or II. Most attacks (89.1%) were treated with a single icatibant injection. For attacks that required two or three injections, the second injection was given a median of 11.0 hours after the first injection, with 90.4% of second injections administered ≥6 hours after the first injection. Time to resolution and attack duration were significantly longer for two or three injections versus one icatibant injection (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified sex, attack severity, and laryngeal attacks as significantly correlated with reinjection (all p ≤ 0.05). These factors did not remain predictors for reinjection when two outlier patients with distinct patterns of icatibant use were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world setting, most HAE attacks resolved with one icatibant injection. There was no distinct profile for patients or attacks that required reinjection when outliers with substantially different patterns of use were excluded. Because new attacks were not distinguished from the recurrence of symptoms, reinjection rates may be slightly higher than shown here. Clinical trial identifier: NCT01034969.

摘要

目的

3期依卡替班试验表明,大多数遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)(C1抑制剂缺乏)急性发作通过注射一次依卡替班(一种选择性缓激肽B2受体拮抗剂)即可成功治疗。我们利用依卡替班疗效调查的数据,在现实环境中对I型和II型HAE发作时依卡替班的再次注射进行了事后分析,依卡替班疗效调查是一项正在进行的观察性研究,旨在监测依卡替班治疗的安全性和有效性。

方法

对依卡替班疗效调查数据(2008年2月至2012年12月)进行依卡替班再次注射的描述性回顾性分析。新发作定义为前一次发作完全缓解后新症状的出现。采用逻辑回归分析探讨患者及发作特征与再次注射之间的潜在关联。

结果

170例I型或II型HAE患者共发生652次发作,接受依卡替班治疗。大多数发作(89.1%)通过单次注射依卡替班注射治疗。对于需要注射两针或三针的发作,第二针在第一针注射后中位数时间为11.0小时,90.4%的第二针在第一针注射后≥6小时给药。与单次注射依卡替班相比,注射两针或三针后的症状缓解时间和发作持续时间显著更长(分别为p<0.0001和p<0.05)。多因素逻辑回归分析确定性别、发作严重程度和喉部发作与再次注射显著相关(所有p≤0.05)。当排除两名依卡替班使用模式不同的异常患者后,这些因素不再是再次注射的预测因素。

结论

在这个现实环境中,大多数HAE发作通过一次依卡替班注射即可缓解。排除使用模式差异较大的异常患者后,需要再次注射的患者或发作没有明显特征。由于新发作与症状复发未作区分,再次注射率可能略高于此处所示。临床试验标识符:NCT01034969。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验