Cramer Paula, Isfort Susanne, Bahlo Jasmin, Stilgenbauer Stephan, Döhner Hartmut, Bergmann Manuela, Stauch Martina, Kneba Michael, Lange Elisabeth, Langerbeins Petra, Pflug Natali, Kovacs Gabor, Goede Valentin, Fink Anna-Maria, Elter Thomas, Fischer Kirsten, Wendtner Clemens-Martin, Hallek Michael, Eichhorst Barbara
Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn, University of Cologne, Munich, Germany
Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn, University of Cologne, Munich, Germany Department for Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Aachen, Munich, Germany.
Haematologica. 2015 Nov;100(11):1451-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.124693. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
To evaluate the effect of first-line and subsequent therapies, the outcome of 1,558 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from five prospective phase II/III trials conducted between 1999 and 2010 was analyzed. The 3-year overall survival rate was higher after first-line treatment with chemoimmunotherapies such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (87.9%) or bendamustine/rituximab (90.7%) compared to chemotherapies without an antibody (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide: 84.6%; fludarabine: 77.5%; chlorambucil: 77.4%). Furthermore, the median overall survival was longer in patients receiving at least one antibody-containing regimen in any treatment line (94.4 months) compared to the survival in patients who never received an antibody (84.3 months, P<0.0001). Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that patients who did receive antibody treatment had a 1.42-fold higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.185-1.694). Therapies administered at relapse were very heterogeneous. Only 55 of 368 patients (14.9%) who started second-line treatment >24 months after first-line therapy repeated the first-line regimen. Among 315 patients requiring treatment ≤24 months after first-line therapy, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone with or without rituximab as well as alemtuzumab were the most commonly used therapies. In these early relapsing patients, the median overall survival was shorter following therapies containing an anthracycline and/or three or more cytotoxic agents (e.g. cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone or fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone, 30.0 months) compared to single agent chemotherapy (e.g. fludarabine; 39.6 months) and standard chemoimmunotherapy (e.g. fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab: 61.6 months). In conclusion, the analysis confirms the superior efficacy of chemoimmunotherapies in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Moreover, the use of aggressive chemo(immuno)therapy combinations in patients with an early relapse does not offer any benefit when compared to less intensive therapies. Trial identifier: NCT00281918, ISRCTN75653261, ISRCTN36294212, NCT00274989 and NCT00147901.
为评估一线及后续治疗的效果,分析了1999年至2010年间开展的五项前瞻性II/III期试验中1558例慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的治疗结果。与不含抗体的化疗方案(氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺:84.6%;氟达拉滨:77.5%;苯丁酸氮芥:77.4%)相比,采用氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺/利妥昔单抗或苯达莫司汀/利妥昔单抗等化疗免疫疗法进行一线治疗后的3年总生存率更高(分别为87.9%和90.7%)。此外,在任何治疗阶段接受至少一种含抗体方案治疗的患者,其总生存期的中位数(94.4个月)长于从未接受过抗体治疗的患者(84.3个月,P<0.0001)。单因素Cox回归分析表明,接受抗体治疗的患者死亡风险高1.42倍(风险比,1.42;95%置信区间:1.185 - 1.694)。复发时给予的治疗差异很大。在一线治疗后>24个月开始二线治疗的368例患者中,只有55例(14.9%)重复了一线治疗方案。在一线治疗后≤24个月需要治疗的315例患者中,环磷酰胺/阿霉素/长春新碱/泼尼松(含或不含利妥昔单抗)以及阿仑单抗是最常用的治疗方法。在这些早期复发的患者中,与单药化疗(如氟达拉滨;39.6个月)和标准化疗免疫疗法(如氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺/利妥昔单抗:61.6个月)相比,含蒽环类药物和/或三种或更多细胞毒性药物的治疗方案(如环磷酰胺/阿霉素/长春新碱/泼尼松或氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺/米托蒽醌,30.0个月)后的总生存期中位数较短。总之,该分析证实了化疗免疫疗法在慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中的卓越疗效。此外,与强度较低的疗法相比,在早期复发患者中使用积极的化疗(免疫)联合疗法并无益处。试验标识符:NCT00281918、ISRCTN75653261、ISRCTN36294212、NCT00274989和NCT00147901。