• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法

Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.

作者信息

Maryn Youri, Kim Hyung-Tae, Kim Jaeock

机构信息

Sint-Augustinus General Hospital, European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Yeson Voice Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011
PMID:26316139
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore the criterion-related concurrent validity of two standardized auditory-perceptual rating protocols and the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) for measuring dysphonia severity in Korean speech.

METHODS

Sixty native Korean subjects with various voice disorders were asked to sustain the vowel [a:] and to read aloud the Korean text "Walk." A 3-second midvowel portion of the sustained vowel and two sentences (with 25 syllables) were edited, concatenated, and analyzed according to methods described elsewhere. From 56 participants, both continuous speech and sustained vowel recordings had sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratios (35.5 dB and 37 dB on average, respectively) and were therefore subjected to further dysphonia severity analysis with (1) "G" or Grade from the GRBAS protocol, (2) "OS" or Overall Severity from the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice protocol, and (3) AVQI.

RESULTS

First, high correlations were found between G and OS (rS = 0.955 for sustained vowels; rS = 0.965 for continuous speech). Second, the AVQI showed a strong correlation with G (rS = 0.911) as well as OS (rP = 0.924). These findings are in agreement with similar studies dealing with continuous speech in other languages.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlights the criterion-related concurrent validity of these methods in Korean speech. Furthermore, it supports the cross-linguistic robustness of the AVQI as a valid and objective marker of overall dysphonia severity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨两种标准化听觉感知评定方案以及声学嗓音质量指数(AVQI)在评估韩语语音中发音障碍严重程度方面与标准相关的同时效度。

方法

60名患有各种嗓音障碍的韩国本土受试者被要求持续发元音[a:]并大声朗读韩语短文“Walk”。根据其他地方描述的方法,对持续元音的3秒中间元音部分以及两个句子(含25个音节)进行编辑、拼接和分析。56名参与者的连续语音和持续元音录音均具有足够高的信噪比(平均分别为35.5 dB和37 dB),因此使用以下方法进行进一步的发音障碍严重程度分析:(1)GRBAS方案中的“G”或等级;(2)嗓音共识听觉感知评估方案中的“OS”或总体严重程度;(3)AVQI。

结果

首先,发现G和OS之间存在高度相关性(持续元音的斯皮尔曼相关系数rS = 0.955;连续语音的rS = 0.965)。其次,AVQI与G(rS = 0.911)以及OS(rP = 0.924)均显示出强相关性。这些发现与其他语言中关于连续语音的类似研究结果一致。

结论

本研究突出了这些方法在韩语语音中与标准相关的同时效度。此外,它支持AVQI作为发音障碍总体严重程度的有效且客观指标的跨语言稳健性。

相似文献

1
Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.韩语嗓音障碍指数量表的验证。
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):948.e1-948.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
4
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
5
Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.验证韩国人群中的嗓音障碍指数 3.01 版和声扰指数。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):660.e9-660.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.提高整体语音质量声学测量的生态有效性:结合连续语音和持续元音。
J Voice. 2010 Sep;24(5):540-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.014. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
7
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity.两种声门噪声指数版本评估嗓音障碍严重程度的比较。
J Voice. 2020 May;34(3):489.e11-489.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.两种嗓音障碍严重程度多参数声学指标的比较:嗓音声学质量指数和嗓音障碍的谐波倒谱谱指数
J Voice. 2018 Jul;32(4):515.e1-515.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.GRBAS 和 Cape-V 量表:在不同时间应用时具有高度可靠性和一致性。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study on Acoustic Voice Quality Index Between the Subjects with Spasmodic Dysphonia and Normophonia.痉挛性发声障碍患者与发声正常者的嗓音声学质量指数对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4927-4932. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02448-5. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
2
Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.探索声学嗓音质量指数与声门功能指数相结合用于嗓音病理学筛查的可行性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;276(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05433-5. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
Effects of Injection Laryngoplasty with Hyaluronic Acid in Patients with Vocal Fold Paralysis.
透明质酸注射喉成形术对声带麻痹患者的影响。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2018 Dec;9(6):354-361. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.6.10.
4
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.