van Bunnik B A D, Ciccolini M, Gibbons C L, Edwards G, Fitzgerald R, McAdam P R, Ward M J, Laurenson I F, Woolhouse M E J
Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 28;15:832. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2172-9.
Detecting novel healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) as early as possible is an important public health priority. However, there is currently no evidence base to guide the design of efficient and reliable surveillance systems. Here we address this issue in the context of a novel pathogen spreading primarily between hospitals through the movement of patients.
Using a mathematical modelling approach we compare the current surveillance system for a HCAI that spreads primarily between hospitals due to patient movements as it is implemented in Scotland with a gold standard to determine if the current system is maximally efficient or whether it would be beneficial to alter the number and choice of hospitals in which to concentrate surveillance effort.
We validated our model by demonstrating that it accurately predicts the risk of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia cases in Scotland. Using the 29 (out of 182) sentinel hospitals that currently contribute most of the national surveillance effort results in an average detection time of 117 days. A reduction in detection time to 87 days is possible by optimal selection of 29 hospitals. Alternatively, the same detection time (117 days) can be achieved using just 22 optimally selected hospitals. Increasing the number of sentinel hospitals to 38 (teaching and general hospitals) reduces detection time by 43 days; however decreasing the number to seven sentinel hospitals (teaching hospitals) increases detection time substantially to 268 days.
Our results show that the current surveillance system as it is used in Scotland is not optimal in detecting novel pathogens when compared to a gold standard. However, efficiency gains are possible by better choice of sentinel hospitals, or by increasing the number of hospitals involved in surveillance. Similar studies could be used elsewhere to inform the design and implementation of efficient national, hospital-based surveillance systems that achieve rapid detection of novel HCAIs for minimal effort.
尽早发现新型医疗保健相关感染(HCAI)是一项重要的公共卫生优先事项。然而,目前尚无证据基础来指导高效且可靠的监测系统的设计。在此,我们在一种主要通过患者流动在医院之间传播的新型病原体的背景下解决这一问题。
我们采用数学建模方法,将苏格兰现行的针对主要因患者流动而在医院之间传播的HCAI的监测系统与金标准进行比较,以确定现行系统是否效率最大化,或者改变集中监测工作的医院数量和选择是否有益。
我们通过证明该模型能准确预测苏格兰耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症病例的风险来验证模型。利用目前贡献了大部分国家监测工作的29家(共182家)哨点医院,平均检测时间为117天。通过优化选择29家医院,可将检测时间缩短至87天。或者,仅使用22家优化选择的医院也可实现相同的检测时间(117天)。将哨点医院数量增加到38家(教学医院和综合医院)可将检测时间缩短43天;然而,将数量减少到7家哨点医院(教学医院)会使检测时间大幅增加至268天。
我们的结果表明,与金标准相比,苏格兰现行的监测系统在检测新型病原体方面并非最优。然而,通过更好地选择哨点医院或增加参与监测的医院数量,可以提高效率。类似的研究可用于其他地方,为设计和实施高效的基于医院的国家监测系统提供参考,以便以最小的努力快速检测新型HCAI。