Suppr超能文献

一项关于外周动脉疾病患者心血管危险因素及跛行症状治疗的前瞻性多中心研究(IDOMENEO研究)。

A prospective multicentre study on the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and claudication symptoms in patients with peripheral artery disease (the IDOMENEO study).

作者信息

Cimminiello Claudio, Arpaia Guido, Polo Friz Hernan, Boracchi Patrizia, Marano Giuseppe, Spezzigu Gabriella, Visonà Adriana

机构信息

1 Internal Medicine, Vimercate Hospital, Italy.

出版信息

Vasa. 2015 Sep;44(5):371-9. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000456.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this prospective multicenter cohort study was to characterise the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and intermittent claudication (IC) symptoms in clinical practice patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), and to determine the care gap with international guidelines and evidence-based therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2011 through 2013, participating centres enrolled consecutive patients with PAD of atherosclerotic, origin demonstrated by ultrasound, ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.9 and symptoms of IC. A seven item grid was built for the assessment of care gap (percentage of patients eligible for a treatment who did not receive it). cerebrovascular disease or at least two CVD risk factors. Care gap was lower than 25 % for any method to stop smoking, lipid lowering agents, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy and any kind of exercise program; between 25% and 50% for ACE inhibitors/ angiotensin II antagonist therapy; between 50% and 75% for beta-blocker therapy; and higher than 75% for supervised exercise program and use of cilostazol. Patients with and without CADI cerebrovascular disease were differently treated with clopidogrel (27.3% and 4.8 %, p < 0.001), any antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy (98.7% and 83.3 %, p <0.001) and beta-blockers (46.8% and 16.0%, p<0.001).

RESULTS

All patients (232) presented at least one CVC risk factor, 90.2% at least two, and 91.5% had either established CAD or

CONCLUSIONS

Many gaps with evidence-based recommendations are still present in the pattern of the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for CVD risk factors and IC symptoms in clinical practice PAD patients.

摘要

背景

这项前瞻性多中心队列研究的目的是描述在临床实践中患有外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患者使用药物和非药物治疗心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素及间歇性跛行(IC)症状的情况,并确定与国际指南和循证治疗之间的护理差距。

患者与方法

从2011年至2013年,参与研究的中心纳入了连续的经超声证实为动脉粥样硬化性起源、踝臂指数(ABI)<0.9且有IC症状的PAD患者。构建了一个七项网格来评估护理差距(符合某种治疗条件但未接受该治疗的患者百分比)。脑血管疾病或至少两个CVD危险因素。任何戒烟方法、降脂药物、抗血小板和/或抗凝治疗以及任何类型的运动计划的护理差距低于25%;ACE抑制剂/血管紧张素II拮抗剂治疗的护理差距在25%至50%之间;β受体阻滞剂治疗的护理差距在50%至75%之间;监督运动计划和西洛他唑使用的护理差距高于75%。有和没有CAD/脑血管疾病的患者在使用氯吡格雷(27.3%和4.8%,p<0.001)、任何抗血小板/抗凝治疗(98.7%和83.3%,p<0.001)和β受体阻滞剂(46.8%和16.0%,p<0.001)方面存在差异。

结果

所有患者(232例)至少有一个CVC危险因素,90.2%至少有两个,91.5%患有已确诊的CAD或

结论

在临床实践中PAD患者使用药物和非药物治疗CVD危险因素及IC症状的模式中,与循证建议仍存在许多差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验