Wolsan Mieczyslaw, Suzuki Satoshi, Asahara Masakazu, Motokawa Masaharu
The Kyoto University Museum, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
The Kyoto University Museum, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0137100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137100. eCollection 2015.
It is contentious whether size variation among mammalian teeth is heterogeneous or homogeneous, whether the coefficient of variation is reliable, and whether the standard deviation of log-transformed data and the residual of standard deviation on mean variable size are useful replacements for the coefficient of variation. Most studies of tooth size variation have been on mammals with complex-crowned teeth, with relatively little attention paid to taxa with simple-crowned teeth, such as Pinnipedia. To fill this gap in knowledge and to resolve the existing controversies, we explored the variation of linear size variables (length and width) for all teeth from complete permanent dentitions of four pinniped species, two phocids (Histriophoca fasciata, Phoca largha) and two otariids (Callorhinus ursinus, Eumetopias jubatus). Size variation among these teeth was mostly heterogeneous both along the toothrow and among species. The incisors, canines, and mesial and distal postcanines were often relatively highly variable. The levels of overall dental size variation ranged from relatively low as in land carnivorans (Phoca largha and both otariids) to high (Histriophoca fasciata). Sexual size dimorphism varied among teeth and among species, with teeth being, on average, larger in males than in females. This dimorphism was more pronounced, and the canines were larger and more dimorphic relative to other teeth in the otariids than in the phocids. The coefficient of variation quantified variation reliably in most cases. The standard deviation of log-transformed data was redundant with the coefficient of variation. The residual of standard deviation on mean variable size was inaccurate when size variation was considerably heterogeneous among the compared variables, and was incomparable between species and between sexes. The existing hypotheses invoking developmental fields, occlusal complexity, and the relative timing of tooth formation and sexually dimorphic hormonal activity do not adequately explain the differential size variation along the pinniped toothrow.
哺乳动物牙齿大小的变化是异质的还是同质的,变异系数是否可靠,以及对数转换数据的标准差和平均变量大小的标准差残差是否是变异系数的有效替代,这些问题都存在争议。大多数关于牙齿大小变化的研究都集中在具有复杂齿冠的哺乳动物上,而对具有简单齿冠的类群(如鳍足类)关注相对较少。为了填补这一知识空白并解决现有争议,我们研究了四种鳍足类物种(两种海豹科动物,即髯海豹和斑海豹;两种海狮科动物,即北海狗和北海狮)完整恒牙列中所有牙齿的线性大小变量(长度和宽度)的变化。这些牙齿之间的大小变化在齿列沿线和物种之间大多是异质的。门齿、犬齿以及前后臼齿通常变异相对较大。整体牙齿大小变化水平从相对较低(如陆地食肉动物中的斑海豹和两种海狮科动物)到较高(髯海豹)不等。两性异形在不同牙齿和不同物种之间存在差异,平均而言,雄性的牙齿比雌性的大。这种两性异形在海狮科动物中比在海豹科动物中更明显,并且犬齿相对于其他牙齿更大且两性异形更显著。在大多数情况下,变异系数能够可靠地量化变异。对数转换数据的标准差与变异系数冗余。当比较变量之间的大小变化存在相当大的异质性时,平均变量大小的标准差残差不准确,并且在物种之间和性别之间无法进行比较。现有的关于发育场、咬合复杂性以及牙齿形成的相对时间和两性异形激素活动的假设,都不能充分解释鳍足类齿列沿线大小变化的差异。