Suppr超能文献

[二尖瓣切开术:手术刀还是球囊?]

[Mitral valvotomy: scalpel or balloon?].

作者信息

Ribeiro P A

出版信息

Rev Port Cardiol. 1989 Oct;8(10):679-81.

PMID:2631816
Abstract

Comparison of results of percutaneous double balloon mitral valvotomy with open surgical valvotomy. The results in 85 patients with mitral stenosis who had successful balloon mitral valvotomy, using 20 + 20 mm diameter balloon catheters, were compared with the results achieved in a group of 85 patients who had elective open mitral valvotomy. Both groups were of similar age. The mean mitral valve area increased from 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 2.0 +/- 0.3 cm2 (p less than 0.001) after balloon valvotomy. The mean mitral valve area increased from 0.9 +/- 0.3 to 2.2 +/- 0.6 cm2 (p less than 0.001) following surgical open valvotomy. Overall, results of balloon mitral valvotomy are comparable to open surgical mitral valvotomy.

摘要

经皮双球囊二尖瓣成形术与直视外科二尖瓣成形术结果比较。对85例二尖瓣狭窄患者采用直径20 + 20 mm球囊导管成功进行球囊二尖瓣成形术的结果,与85例择期直视二尖瓣成形术患者的结果进行比较。两组年龄相似。球囊瓣膜成形术后二尖瓣平均瓣口面积从0.9±0.2增加至2.0±0.3 cm²(p<0.001)。直视外科瓣膜成形术后二尖瓣平均瓣口面积从0.9±0.3增加至2.2±0.6 cm²(p<0.001)。总体而言,球囊二尖瓣成形术的结果与直视外科二尖瓣成形术相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验